Tuesday, November 26, 2019

Your Favorite Movie: The Silence of the Lambs, with Stephan C.


Welcome once again to Your Favorite Movie, in which we pretend that we need a friend's help in loading a couch into a van, but really we're closing the van doors and forcing them to tell us about their favorite movie of all time.

This week, Stephan C****** puts the lotion in the basket and tells us about his favorite movie. Like many of my college friends, I met him through the theater program, where he was Bobby Strong-ing his way through Urinetown, and showing this dumb freshman the ropes. Stephan has the gift of making people want to be his friend, and so I've been his friend for a while now, always finding time to grab a couple beers and catch up. So yeah, I was real excited to finally sit down and talk with him about his movie.

That movie is, obviously, The Silence of the Lambs. Even if you've never seen the movie, you know this movie. It's one of the classics. We discuss it below, with Allison and Pam, whom you know from previous entries in the YFM canon. The conversation is transcribed with permission, and slightly edited, mainly to cut out Pam's out-of-nowhere monologue about how the priest from Fleabag is so hot(????). Enjoy!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Joe: We're talking about this right before Halloween, but this is going to be published right before Thanksgiving. So is this more of a Halloween movie, or more of a Thanksgiving movie? [laughter]

Stephan: Well, I'm thankful that they—spoilers—that they catch Buffalo Bill. Well, that they kill Buffalo Bill. Even though Hannibal gets away. It's a suspenseful movie, so it definitely fits Halloween.

Allison: But it's not like a "Halloween scary" movie.

Joe: And I definitely want to get into that eventually.

Allison: Do they reference what time of year this takes place at all? It just seems autumnal.

Pam: Yeah, it seems a little chilly. Clarice has her heavy jacket on most of the time.

Stephan: She's running though the woods with a sweatshirt on.

Allison: So yeah. [laughter] It's a late-autumn movie.

Joe: They kind of talk about the importance of meals in this movie...?

Pam: For Thanksgiving?

Joe: Yeah, even though the meals are human flesh. Or, ya know, the weird bonds we build among unlikely parties.

Stephan: Coming together.

Joe: Clarice and Hannibal become a... family... that they're thankful for...?

Allison: Much like the pilgrims.

Pam: We watched the "human meat" episode of It's Always Sunny last night.

Joe: I mean... that was definitely a joke question. But this movie actually premiered in theaters on St. Valentine's Day.

Stephan: Oh yeah, we did read that.

Joe: So I guess it could be a St. Valentine's Day movie?

Pam: I wonder what the trailer was. [laughter] If they were like, [voice-over movie trailer voice] "Coming this Valentine's Day..."

Joe: Do you think there were couples who went to see this for their first date on Valentine's Day, and are married still?

Allison: I hope so!

Pam: Probably. It's definitely a popcorn movie. I'm sure it drew a lot of people into the theaters.

Stephan: And suspenseful movies are good movies to take a date to.

Allison: I could definitely see someone taking advantage of that last hour of the movie, having a woman clinging to him in the seat next to him.

Joe: I tried to do some googling, like, "is silence of the lambs a good valentines movie," and VH1 actually had a listicle. [laughter] For why this is a good Valentine's Day movie! It was... real bad. It was real bad.

Stephan: I will say, though—this is a very Drew A******* thing to know—it was not originally scheduled to be released on Valentine's Day.

Joe: Oh god.

Stephan: I know. So it was originally supposed to be released in the Fall of '90, but they didn't want to compete with Dances with Wolves, for the Oscars. Because they felt like they had a good movie.

Pam: Did Dances with Wolves win?

Stephan: I believe so, yeah. So they just decided to do it afterward.

Joe: So they didn't do it on purpose.

Stephan: They didn't do it on purpose. But it's still really funny that it was released on Valentine's Day.

Joe: So VH1 was wrong when they said one of the reasons this is a good Valentine's Day movie is because "Lambs are cute."

Pam: ...There aren't even any lambs in it. [laughter]

Allison: I guess if you wanted to trick somebody into thinking this could be a cute, romantic movie?

Stephan: Maybe this is a Halloween movie. Maybe the dog was really a lamb? The dog's cute and fluffy.

Allison: The dog is lamb-like! I've never considered that.

Joe: He's not silenced though. He's very loud, in all his scenes.

Pam: True.

Joe: Okay, so... another question that seems like a joke question, but it's really not. Glad to have Allison N*** back on the record. Wizard of Oz is definitely still one of my favorite movie discussions I've had. So, glad to have you back. What are some connections we can find between Silence of the Lambs and Wizard of Oz?

[laughter]

Joe: It seems like a joke question, but it's a serious question. As we're going through this, I'm starting to form a theory that all these movies are connected in some way. I started to create this big chart with lines connecting each movie, with reasons why they're connected.

Pam: Wait, where is this chart? Am I going to walk down our basement and find red yarn on a bulletin board? [laughter]

Stephan: Pepe Silvia!

Joe: But for real, how me fill in the blanks. What goes on the line between Wizard of Oz and Silence of the Lambs?

Stephan: That's.... do you have anything in mind?

Joe: I have some things that I think are comparisons, but I'd like to hear your take.

Allison: I think you can draw some parallels between Clarice and Dorothy. They're far from home. They're on their own.

Stephan: She's kind of living in man's world. She's a strong female character in a world full of men, but she's definitely taking charge, taking lead. I've never thought about this... [laughter]

Pam: The guy who's there is the "mastermind." Hannibal is more impressive of a mastermind. But the Wizard appears at first to be a mastermind.

Joe: Right, and we talked about in the Oz interview how the Wizard sent them to their death, right?

Allison: Where she had to prove herself in order to get where she was trying to go, which for Dorothy was home, and for Clarice was the FBI.

Joe: I kind of compared the Wicked Witch of the East to Buffalo Bill, in that, to the characters in the town that they lived, they were the main villain. To us as the audience, by the end of the movie, they were not the main villain. It ended up being the Witch of the West and Hannibal that were the actual threat.

Allison: Interesting.

Joe: And we can also compare the Lion's "King of the Forrest" to Buffalo Bill's tucked-penis karaoke!

Stephan: They're pretty much the same. [laughter]

Pam: He even has a little bow in his hair! [laughter]

Allison: It's true though. They're scenes that make you ask, "Why was this included? But if it wasn't included, would I have missed it?" We were talking about this last night. Because you [Stephan] were like, "We didn't need to see this." but I was like, it's so jarring... you need it.

Stephan: I don't know if it's needed, but it definitely works, and it definitely solidifies his weirdness.

Allison: If you didn't fully understand what Buffalo Bill was trying to achieve, that scene is like, "Oh... I get it."

Pam: Because doesn't he have part of the skins on?

Stephan: He's got the scalped wig.

Allison: You see on the mannequin half of the suit. With only one boob... which we can get to later...

Pam: He's waiting for someone else for that other boob, I guess.

Joe: I feel like Buffalo Bill, who's seemed like—I mean, I didn't give a shit about this movie in '91, I was three years old—but it seemed like, from reading about it, that there was a lot of people that misunderstood what Buffalo Bill was all about. LGBT communities were offended, like, "Why did the only gay character in this movie have to be a killer?"

Stephan: I think it's a valid argument. But I don't know if I agree with it. I think it's just an element of his character. It's not that this trans man wants to... that all trans men are violent, or something like that. I don't get that. I think it's kind of a stretch. In the movie, they try to justify his behavior. They say something along the lines of... I forget.

Allison: Well, Hannibal says something like, "He's not really transsexual, he just thinks that he is because of years of abuse and trauma. He's trying to find his own identity."

Stephan: Although, I think that's still problematic, because that's still kind of a misunderstanding of transexuality. I don't think the movie portrays it in a great light, but I don't think it's as bad as the LGBT community might've made it out to be. And again... I wasn't old enough to know the impact. What I do think is interesting, though, is Jonathan Demme's next movie is Philadelphia. I think the LGBT community is very pro- that movie. I wonder if that was in response to the criticisms from Silence of the Lambs?

Joe: And if it helps your argument, the director didn't even believe that Buffalo Bill was gay at all. I got a quote here. "He wasn't a gay character. He was a tormented man who hated himself and wished he was a woman because that would have made him as far away from himself as he possibly could be."

Allison: Right, and there's some Nazi symbolism happening with Buffalo Bill too. I read an article, I think it was the actor stating, "I never intended to play him as gay, or queer, or a member of that community." But pointing out that this was an individual who had gone through multiple identity shifts, and tried to find an identity that fits him, and just had a twisted mind to take it in this direction. Is it a good representation regardless? No, but...

Joe: It's hard to give a good representation of a serial killer.

Allison: For the '90s, there wasn't going to be a good representation of different orientations, so... it's unfortunate. But I don't think that was intention of the film.

Stephan: So something—and I don't know if I'm jumping the gun—actually, it's my interview, I can say whatever I want.

Joe: Yeah, do it up man! I'm tired of you coming out of the bullpen! It's your fucking interview this time, man!

Stephan: One of my favorite things about the movie—and probably one of the most unconformable—is the amount of direct eye-contact. Like, the idea that you're being "watched." So Clarice is in a man's world, right? Most of the interactions she's had are with men, outside of the one girlfriend she has. Very few of the exchanges are a two-person shot. They are all very up-close on the eyes and face, and I feel like everyone who is looking at her is objectifying her. And that's an unwanted feeling. But you look at Buffalo Bill, and he wants to be a woman, he wants the focus to be on him, he wants to be objectified. I think it's an interesting element, making him trans for that reason. So, maybe it seems a little insensitive, but I think it's interesting. It's like, well, women don't want to be looked at that way, but he wants you to look. He does these heinous murders because that way you will see him.

Joe: And also, he's looking directly at the camera, for most of his shit. Same with Hannibal. I'm not sure if they were trying to make that a serial killer thing. But Jodie Foster doesn't really look at the camera directly. A lot of the shots, she's looking off to the side. I guess that plays into the "her being watched." The camera is playing from the perspective of the watchers.

Pam: Didn't she have a crazy stalker in real life too?

Allison: Oh yeah!

Joe: After this movie?

Pam: I don't know if it was before or after. She's definitely had a stalker in real life, it was significant. [looking it up] John Hinckley Jr.

Allison: I think the stalker was portrayed in the musical Assassins?

Stephan: Oh yeah! I think that he was played by... Chris McBride.

Pam: Weird.

Joe: Okay, hold up...

Stephan: So in the Sondheim musical Assassins, it's all these killers—

Allison: He sings a duet with Squeaky Fromme? One of the Manson girls.

Stephan: "Unworthy of Your Love," which I think is one of the best songs in the show. That's Jodie Foster's stalker.

Joe: The character is based on him?

Allison: The character is him. He tried to assassinate Reagan to impress Jodie Foster.

Stephan: Which is crazy.

Allison: She probably wasn't impressed by that...

Joe: So there is a musical based on this movie. Unlike the other movies that we've talked about that had musicals based on them, this one is unofficial. It almost comes off like a parody. It's called SILENCED! With all caps, and an exclamation point.

Allison: That's never a good sign.

Joe: I listened to a few songs. It was pretty funny. The Clarice character had a very heavy lisp, a heavy Southern tilt, to the point that you could tell they were making fun of her. One of the songs was called "If I Could Smell Her Cunt," which Hannibal sings from his jail cell.

Stephan: I wish it was Miggs, jerking off while he sings about it.

Pam: And then he swallows his tongue at the end of it.

Stephan: When did it come out?

Joe: Apparently it started out as an internet joke? Like an online community, making some of the songs, and it snowballed into an off-Broadway type deal.

Stephan: An early Harry Potter: The Musical-type thing.

Joe: Yeah, we can go into all the stuff inspired by this movie, or what it was inspired by. Again, I kind of see this interview as a sequel to the Wizard of Oz interview, and we definitely talked about all these subjects then. Like—it was based on a book, and what are the differences, etc.

Allison: And similar to my response for Wizard of Oz... have you [Stephan] read or seen anything related?

Stephan: I haven't read anything related. I haven't seen the sequels. I haven't seen the TV show.

Allison: He's a Silence of the Lambs purist!

Stephan: I just love this movie.

Pam: The other ones are probably not as good.

Stephan: I hear Manhunter is good. The original movie version.

Joe: Oh, yeah! That was... the first prequel was a rewrite of that movie, I think?

Stephan: Yeah. Red Dragon.

Allison: Red Dragon's not bad.

Joe: Hannibal is the sequel, so they're trying to catch him. Hannibal Rising looked real bad, according to the Wikipedia article I read.

Pam: And Anthony Perkins is not in it?

Joe: That's the only one he's not in.

Pam: So you already know that it's bad, based on that.

Joe: I'm surprised nobody's read the book though.

Allison: I read it. I read it in high school.

Joe: It was pretty close to the movie?

Allison: From what I remember, it was pretty close. There were scenes in the movie... I hadn't seen the movie in a long time, but rewatching the movie, I felt like I was remembering scenes from the book. Which was weird, because I don't remember a lot of books that I read anymore.

Pam: Was the book called The Silence of the Lambs?

Joe: Yeah. And I couldn't find too many differences. It was a lot closer to the source material than Wizard of Oz.

Allison: I think they trimmed a lot of stuff about Buffalo Bill.

Joe: Right, because some of it was from his perspective, right?

Allison: His character gets kind of chopped up a little bit. From what I read the other night, there's more explanation for his trauma and his personality, why he's doing what he's doing, that they kind of sum up. In the book, Clarice or the other FBI guy go to one of the hospitals, and talk to a doctor that would've been treating people with gender reassignment surgery about what to look for. They dig into that a little more.

Stephan: They kind of skim over that in the movie.

Allison: They do skim over it. Like, "Oh, we called up hospitals, and his name was on a list!" Great! [laughter] "We're going to the wrong house right now!"

Pam: I love that scene, when they're going to the wrong house entirely.

Joe: Was there a TV show that did that? Breaking Bad or something? Where it was cross-cutting, but it ended up being two different houses? What was that from?

Pam: This Is Us? [laughter]

Joe: "It's a completely different decade!"

Pam: But I loved that, when they did that in the movie. [Editor's note: Someone help me out with this, because I don't know how to google the answer to what other movie or TV show this type of thing was in. I'll edit this note and give you credit!]

Allison: Seeing it several times, it's still so intense.

Stephan: Even last night, knowing what's going to happen, I was like, "Oh my god."

Pam: And the scene where the power's cut, and she's walking around, it's just incredible. Do you have anything about—do you know if they filmed it in pitch black? Was Jodie Foster not able to see anything?

Allison: She really does sell what she's trying to do. I had kind of forgotten how good Jodie Foster is, and how believable she is. We've talked about how the male gaze objectifies her, but I feel like the movie doesn't sexualize her in any way. She's not "hot." She's not a "hot lady detective." She's a student, and she's trying to be professional.

Stephan: All of her traits—she's very strong, she's very wise, she's brave as shit.

Joe: You don't think the male characters sexualize her at all?

Allison: I think they do, but I think the way the movie...

Joe: The movie is portraying these dudes as scumbags.

Allison: Exactly. They're kind of creepy.

Pam: The other small-town cops in that town.

Allison: They're either being creepy or belittling, or they're dismissive, or they're... the bug guys. So, harmless—

Stephan: But the bug guys are still hitting on her! And still being kind of creepy dudes. [laughter]

Pam: I forgot about the bug guys.

Joe: Me too.

Allison: I also forgot about the bug guys.

Joe: Aw, poor bug guys. We all forgot about them.

Allison: They're at the party at the end! They get cake, and pictures.

Pam: They were pretty essential in figuring the whole thing out.

Joe: I guess that's another thing—the bugs symbolizing the "metamorphosis" of Bill.

Pam: As Hannibal points out.

Allison: But is Buffalo Bill the only character in this movie who is trying to go through a metamorphosis? Clarice is trying to go from student to detective.

Stephan: And she's trying to break the mold of the other female students, who probably haven't had such an opportunity, because of their gender. And she's fucking crushing it, doing better than all the guys, making everyone look foolish.

Allison: Really making everyone look foolish.

Joe: So what does that say about Hannibal, that he's the most comfortable in his own skin? ...No pun intended.

Allison: I think he's already a butterfly. He knows who he is. He embraces that.

Stephan: I think he needs to change. I just don't think he wants to change.

Allison: But I feel like... the scene toward the end, when he attacks both of the guards. I feel like, every time I see that scene, I think, "There's gotta be another way to incapacitate this guard than biting his face." But it's just who he is! He wants to bite this guard in the face.

Stephan: But think about the form of combat you are not prepared for as a police officer—someone biting you in the face. You might be expecting him to swing, you might be expecting him to reach for your gun, or kick you in the balls. You're definitely not expecting someone to grab your face and bite it.

Pam: Well, you should be expecting that with Hannibal Lecter. They couldn't have known he had the key to the handcuffs in his mouth, but still...

Allison: Protect your face.

Pam: They were pretty lax about it.

Joe: That's probably a good segue to talk about why this movie is scary. Do we all agree that it's a "scary" movie?

Stephan: I would say scary. For me, even rewatching it last night—it had been a few years since I'd seen it last—and there were certain things, I was like, "Wow, this really plays up on all of my fears." I am very afraid of insects. So pretty much the whole bug guy scene creeps me out, and gives me the chills.

Pam: And all the moths flying around?

Stephan: And they find the pod in her mouth, and it's just like, "This is really gross."

Joe: Is it more creepy than scary?

Stephan: No, because it also plays up on a lot of traditional fears. Like the idea of being stalked. That's really terrifying! That's not just creepy, that's very scary, and dangerous.

Pam: Because it could happen to you! I feel like I watched a lot of serial killer stuff this year. I watched the Ted Bundy thing, we watched Mindhunter. It's so scary because that's all true. It's all things that have happened to people.

Allison: I do feel like the way that Catherine gets kidnapped is a very classic SVU-type scene. A woman coming home from work, has groceries—

Joe: Playing "American Girl."

Allison: —an unsuspecting man with a broken arm, needing help getting a couch in. And she stupidly gets into the van.

Pam: I don't know if it's because I've seen this movie so many times, or just because it's 2019, but I would never fucking help someone with that.

Allison: And she's a fairly unsympathetic victim.

Joe: Right! When she's like "Get the fuck back here!" to Clarice.

Allison: "You fucking bitch!" I do love that.

Joe: Who among us wouldn't do that?

Stephan: It's definitely funny, but I would leave her ass in that well. [laughter]

Allison: But I do feel like that scene is like, "It could happen to anyone." You stop to help a stranger, and that stranger could kidnap you to do who knows what to you. And I think that plays on some very real fears from the '80s and '90s—kids getting snatched up, things like that. It plays up a lot of real fears, and takes a lot of serial killer tropes that people were familiar with, and turns them into these new characters. And you're like, "Great, now I have to be afraid of this guy too." And bugs! And the dark!

Stephan: And close corridors, if you're a little claustrophobic too. I feel like it does a good job using very general fears, and incorporating them into the movie.

Joe: For me personally, I get more creeped out when it's unsettling, versus a sudden burst of violence of something. Like, just the way Hannibal looks at Clarice creeped me out more than a dude being crucified.

Stephan: I agree with that. I don't really like direct eye contact. I feel like I haven't looked at anyone in the eye for too long. There's so much direct eye contact in that movie. Yeah, Hannibal is in your head, because he's looking at you directly in the eye!

Allison: The intense framing of their last scene together, where he has his head tilted down, and his eyes pointed up at the camera, and he's not blinking, and it's the tightest of close-ups... it's so unsettling. And you know that he is not a threat to her, but you still feel threatened by him. In this scene, he's not threatening her, but he's just such an intimidating character. I think that's why he's such a memorable presence in the film.

Joe: Actually, according to AFI—the American Film Institute—he was ranked the number one villain of all time.

Stephan: Oh, really?

Allison: Which is crazy, because he's not the main villain in this movie.

Pam: He doesn't do anything.

Stephan: I think we tried to look it up—someone said he was on screen for only sixteen minutes, someone else said twenty.

Allison: We weren't sure if they were doing literally when he was on the screen, or included all the scenes that he was in.

Joe: I know it was the second-least amount of screen time for any winner of Best Lead Actor.

Stephan: Was the first Anne Hathaway?

Joe: Nah, it was some dude from the '50s, from a movie I'd never heard of. [Editor's note: Some clarifications. According to everywhere I can find, Hannibal is on screen for sixteen minutes. Stephan is right in that Hathaway was in Les Mis for only fifteen minutes. For Best Lead Actor specifically, Hopkins is second to David Niven in 1958's Separate Tables, in which Niven is on screen for fifteen minutes and 38 seconds.] But this was a cool list to look at. The Wicked Witch of the West was number four! Mr. Potter was number six!

Allison: A good collection.

Joe: So what does that say about your three, as a collective, that your favorite movies have such strong villains?

Allison: And they're all such different movies. Is there a connection between It's a Wonderful Life and Silence of the Lambs?

Joe: Oh, absolutely.

Allison: Is there?

Joe: Yeah.

Pam: What is that connection?

Joe: Wait... until I can do a little more research.

Allison: George Bailey covets a better life, so he and Buffalo Bill are pretty much the same person.

Pam: He's far away from home too, right? And he's objectified... No, I'm just kidding.

Allison: Zuzu is clearly the lamb. [laughter]

Joe: To be fair, Clarice and George Bailey were both in the top ten of Heroes. No Dorothy.

Allison: Well, that's fair. She's far more passive in her journey than Clarice is.

Joe: Yeah, I don't even think she was in the top fifty.

Allison: I get that. I'll take the L.

Joe: Do you mind if I use the bathroom real quick? Unless anyone has anything else to add about Dorothy's omission from this list?

Stephan: ...I think you're good.

[bathroom break]

Joe: Okay, I found the connection between Wonderful Life and Silence of the Lambs. I needed the silence of the bathroom to think. The white noise of my urine hitting porcelain. So, imagine George Bailey, after everyone leaves his house in the last scene. The phone rings. He picks it up. It's fucking Mr. Potter, who says, "I'm still out there. I'm going to keep fucking with you."

Pam: Well, he is still out there.

Joe: Right. As too is Hannibal!

Pam: But Hannibal doesn't fuck with Clarice.

Joe: Watch the sequel!

Stephan: He's not out for Clarice, though. He's definitely out there to eat some people, and definitely kill Chilton.

Joe: Mr. Potter wasn't out for George Bailey specifically. He was fucking everyone in town.

Pam: No, I think he was out for George Bailey. He found the money, and he didn't give it back, because he knew it was George Bailey's. He was on his way to give it back to the bank, and he was like, "No no no, turn me around."

Joe: Because it promoted his own twisted self-interests. Not because he had a personal vendetta against George.

Pam: I think he did have a personal vendetta. Against the Bailey boys.

Joe: I'd be happy to continue to go down this rabbit hole with you.

Pam: Not right now.

Joe: We briefly mentioned the Oscars before, but I want to talk about that. It won a lot of major awards.

Stephan: Actually, my other favorite movie was nominated for an Oscar the same year.

Pam: What movie?

Stephan: Beauty and the Beast.

Allison: The man contains multitudes.

Stephan: '91 was a good year for me.

Joe: I want to quote you from the Wizard of Oz interview: "How often does the most popular movie, or even the movie that I thought was the best that year, actually win Best Picture?" So I thought it was interesting that your favorite movie actually won that year.

Stephan: Because they intentionally didn't have it go against Dances with Wolves!

Allison: It was interesting that it was released in February, and didn't win until the following year. Not a lot of Oscar-winning movies do that. I don't think the studio believed in it enough to release it during Oscar season? But that movie held on for eleven months.

Stephan: Which speaks volumes. And apparently, this was the first movie to have a VHS release, and then go on to win the Oscar. I thought that was pretty interesting.

Pam: I do remember going to Blockbuster, and seeing a whole shelf of that movie, the cover with the butterfly on the mouth, and just being like [makes shuddering sound].

Allison: It's a jarring image.

Stephan: And it has the little skull head on it. It's terrifying! So what did it win for? It won Actress, Actor, Picture...

Joe: Director.

Stephan: And Adapted Screenplay, right?

Joe: Yup. It only lost in Sound and Editing. Both to Terminator 2.

Stephan: ...I quite like Terminator 2. Third favorite movie...? It's not. [laughter]

Joe: Okay, but does... I guess after the fact, when critics are all in on a certain movie, TV show, book, does that affect your opinion at all? Are you that type of person? I know I'm that type of person. Like, I will really like a TV show, but then read a critical review of it, and be like, "You're right! This is a fucking great TV show!" People convince me that it's even better than I originally thought.

Allison: But is the opposite true? Where you'll like something, and you'll read a bad review of it? And you're like, "Man, maybe I didn't like that as much as I thought I did."

Joe: I dunno. Pam had mentioned This Is Us. Critics don't seem to be all in on This Is Us.

Pam: Critics don't like it?

Joe: I mean, AVClub reviews it, but that's one person.

Pam: It's definitely not at the level of other shows that AVClub usually reviews. But for mass audiences, it's popular. Like, our parents watch it.

Joe: So no, I don't think I've ever liked something, and someone said it was bad, and I agreed with them. But I think definitely the opposite, if I already like something, and someone is talking about it, I tend to like it more because of that.

Allison: It feels vindicating—"I was right about this!"

Stephan: I do wonder... because, even now, I will not go see a movie unless it was well-reviewed by a friend, or a critic. I saw this movie way after it had won, already knowing the character of Hannibal, knowing Jodie Foster... personally...

Joe: You're the stalker?!

Stephan: So I do wonder, if this movie came out now... well, if it came out now, it would be well-reviewed, and of course I would go see it. But I would also say that this is a genre of movie I gravitate toward. I feel like I always want to see movies of this genre. And that's probably because I really like this movie. It was one of my first introductions to good movies in this genre. I'm used to crappy movies...

Pam: Because there's so many movies that come out in this genre, horror...

Stephan: Most of them are so bad. I grew up watching Tales from the Crypt with my dad. Looking back, so much TV-14 stuff that I should not have been watching when I was young. But it's super cheesy, and none of it is good. But I love that! And it's a little scary, a little spooky, whatever. So I just always gravitated toward that. So this movie would be an easy sell for me now, because that's just what I like.

Allison: And I feel like I'd be really hesitant to go see it in theaters.

Stephan: Yes. But I am too easily influence by reviews.

Joe: I don't think there's anything wrong with that.

Stephan: But sometimes I miss out on things that I could enjoy. So many of the other movies that I like from my past are shitty movies. My favorite holiday film is Jingle All the Way. That movie is terrible! But I love that movie! And I'm sure that movie got ripped to shreds in reviews. I know this is something you always talk about regarding "favorite movies." What makes something your favorite? It's that personal connection. I mean, yeah, a movie could be garbage, but there's something that personally connects it to me.

Pam: I feel like kids, growing up, you're less likely to see something because it's well-reviewed. It's more like, "This is a popular movie that's out, I'm going to see it, because all my friends are going to see it." Even now, I'm putting on crap movies, because they're kids movies. "Let's watch Trolls." It's a kids movie that might keep Willow's attention for a little bit. I watched Hotel Transylvania like three times. But... I kind of like that.

Joe: "Pam's favorite movie of all time." [laughter] I feel like we're kind of getting there, Stephan explaining why this is his favorite movie of all time. I thought it would be interesting, in the same vein as interviewing a serial killer, if we could try to guess, or maybe psychoanalyze Stephan, in terms of what we know about him as a person.

Allison: Mhm. Yes. Great.

Joe: And how we can connect him to this movie. I mean, Allison knows you the best. So Allison, in a vacuum, knowing Stephan. and knowing that this is his favorite movie, why would you say that this is his favorite?

Allison: It's interesting. When we first had this discussion, months ago, when you first introduced this concept, Stephan said that this was his favorite movie, and I said, "Really? This is your favorite movie?" I know a lot of movies that Stephan likes, and this is one I would not have immediately guessed. But then after watching it last night—well, at first, I was like, "Oh yeah, this movie is a lot better than I remembered." Because all I remembered was Hannibal Lecter's stuff, Buffalo Bill's stuff, and then I knew there was a lot of Clarice stuff in the middle, and I wasn't sure if I cared about that. But I do! It's really good! But when Stephan pointed out that this movie has so many things that you don't like in the world—bugs, darkness, enclosed spaces—I was like, "Do you like this movie because it challenges you?" It's not just a standard horror movie. You watch a lot of silly scary movies when you're working from home. The crappy Hulu things.

Stephan: ...I watch good scary movies too.

Allison: I'll come home, and you'll be like, "Oh my god, I watched the dumbest movie." [laughter] But this movie, it challenges you. It doesn't just try to scare you. It gives you all of the things you don't like, but it's packaging them in a really enticing way.

Joe: So you're saying that Stephan is someone who likes a challenge.

Allison: Yes. In real life. [mumbling] That's why he likes me... [laughter]

Stephan: I want to hear what everyone else has to say.

Pam: I was going to say, weren't you a Psych major?

Stephan: Yup.

Pam: So I feel like that, with the psych thing, getting in the mind of someone, finding out what makes them tick.

Joe: That's what my notes said too. We watched Mindhunter, and all that was about was understanding someone—and I guess this is a snake eating its own tail, in that we are trying to psychoanalyze you, and I'm saying that you like to psychoanalyze us...?

Stephan: "Why do people do the things that they do and like what they like?" You hit the nail on the head.

Joe: That's your fucking job. You work in behavioral health.

Stephan: I actually picked this field, because it was something people told me I was good at. When I was growing up, people would say, "Oh, your a pretty good listener." And, ya know... young people don't really talk about what they're gonna do, unless they definitively know, like, "Oh, I'm gonna be a cop." ...Sorry, that came off wrong. Being a cop is a great profession! [laughter]

Joe: Whole different conversation.

Stephan: But I feel like it's always been one of my strengths. I've always felt like I'm good at watching people. We're here talking, but interviews are something that I would generally shy away from, because I don't like to say too much. You guys have known me for a long time, but I'm generally quieter. Without alcohol, I'm usually one of the more quiet ones.

Joe: I don't know if I agree with that.

Stephan: I mean, personally, I feel like I'm less verbose.

Joe: You're less likely to speak abrasively toward your friends.

Stephan: That's fair, yes. I dunno. I just like observing... not a in voyeuristic way.

Allison: "Who do you identify with in this movie?" [laughter]

Stephan: I don't have to answer that! [laughter] But you could argue that Clarice is doing the same thing to Hannibal. She doesn't know Hannibal, she's observing him and communicating with him to get more insight into why he is the way he is, so she can get more insight into Buffalo Bill's psyche. That's something that's always been inherently interesting to me, which is why I love the behavioral field, which weirdly shaped me, I guess? This is way too much to think about, Joe. [laughter]

Joe: Well, alright, but let's go further in that direction. Say you were the one trying to interview Hannibal Lecter. Him being the perceptive monster that he is, how would he try to break you?

Pam: Like, what's your lamb story? [laughter]

Joe: Yeah, exactly.

Stephan: I think what he would do specifically to me is what he does to Clarice in the very beginning. He picks out very obvious physical characteristics. It's very easy to tell what people are insecure about. Often times, people with teeth issues will cover their mouth, that's something their insecure about. For me, I kind of... well, I won't say what mine are. [laughter] But I feel like he would be very quick to point out things in my physicality that would give you insight into what I'm insecure about. Until the third interview, when he's delving deeper into, ya know, "What's your traumatic story?" I tried to save the lambs! [laughter] Guys, I'm absolutely not running out into the cold with a lamb. That lamb is going die. And probably be a delicious lamb chop. [laughter]

Joe: Yeah, I wasn't trying to get you to tell a traumatic story or anything.

Stephan: And I'm not going to. No, but I do think it would be physical characteristics, because that's the easiest thing to see right away. Even in an interview, half the time the reason someone doesn't get a second interview is because of some physicality.

Joe: For Clarice, it was her accent, right?

Allison: "Your good purse and your cheap shoes."

Stephan: Right. And she didn't say anything about herself, but he could pick up on all those things, because of how she was presenting herself.

Allison: I feel like that's another fear that people have. That you're going to be "found out." Clarice comes into the movie, she accepts the assignment, and she's very... you can tell she's a bit unsure. But that moment when Hannibal starts picking her apart like a catty bitch. It's kind of delicious to watch, but there's a fear of being on the other side of that, of someone being able to pick out all of your flaws.

Joe: No, that's pretty scary for sure. It definitely—not to talk about myself that much—but I definitely agree that it's an interesting part of this movie. I'm just very interested in why people act certain ways, why people think certain things. I guess that's kind of—ostensibly—why I'm doing these interviews.

Stephan: A social experiment.

Joe: I know it's mainly to just to hang out with people. but I like to pretend that it's so we can try to understand more about each other. Not in a creepy serial killer way, but... it's definitely interesting.

Stephan: The movies we've identified as our favorite—as you said before, is kind of a B.S. question—but I think it says a lot about us. I think all of your psychoanalysis was correct. I think everyone is spot on, as much as I'd like to deny it.

Joe: Okay, so then speak plainly about why this is your favorite movie. Did any of that play into this?

Stephan: I mean, I can definitely look back and say that I've been influenced by this movie. This isn't why I originally chose to go back to this movie. This is a movie that I saw way too early. I think my grandma just had it on, and I was like, "...what is a cunt?" [laughter]

Joe: That's a big theme in these interviews—grandparents that just don't give a shit.

Stephan: So this is just a movie that was on. And it wasn't until I rewatched it in high school, all the way through, that I was like, "Oh my god, Buffalo Bill is the actual villain of this movie." I had just seen bits and pieces up to that point. And when you're a kid, what's the scariest thing? Hannibal Lecter staring at you. I feel like, outside of the behavioral stuff and social science stuff, I just love the suspense. The movie is exciting, but it's cerebral. I love this genre, and this movie knocks it out of the park.

Allison: And it's gorier than I remembered.

Stephan: It's definitely bloodier than I remembered.

Joe: They kind of hold it close to the chest for a little bit. It's not a gore-fest or anything.

Stephan: Until the final twenty minutes, when they have the angel gutted—

Allison: He's wearing the face.

Joe: Even leading up to that, though, I thought personally the creepiest part of the movie was when Lecter had the police baton, the way he was swinging it, with just a blank expression.

Allison: And the light spray from him. It's not like he's splashed with blood, but it's just a light mist.

Stephan: And even then, you never see that officer's face.

Pam: Right before that, he's sitting in there listening to music, and he's doing the same thing [makes conductor motions with hands]. So it's just as easy as listening to music for him. And all the gore is with Lecter, pretty much. I mean, they show the girls, the victims of Buffalo Bill.

Allison: Yeah, you see some pictures, and you see the one corpse.

Stephan: But you don't actually see Buffalo Bill hurt anyone.

Allison: You don't see him doing anything, really. He's wearing a scalp... okay, maybe we're being dismissive of all these horrors. [laughter]

Joe: Yeah, "There's no blood, it's just skin!"

Allison: "It's not that bad!" One thing I can never not think is... did the skin suit smell? Or did he treat it in a way that he could sew it...? Because these women had been murdered over the course of several week, right?

Joe: Well, he lotioned them up before he killed them.

Allison: Right, but that's not preserving your skin. That's just to keep your skin nice and soft.

Joe: Maybe he was still lotioning them, even after the skin left the body.

Allison: It's just... something I think about.

Joe: If there's anything we can take away from this movie, it's that skin smells when it's detached from the body.

Allison: I assume!

Stephan: Considering the condition of his house, I don't think he cares about the smell of a human hide. To be honest!

Allison: But he's wearing it! He's going through so much trouble so he can wear it.

Stephan: In the well, there are fingernails and blood. He doesn't care! That dog shits all over the basement!

Pam: There are bugs flying everywhere.

Allison: There is an old woman decaying in the bathtub.

Pam: I always forget about that too.

Allison: I also saw this movie probably too young, and I feel like that image stuck with me. Because it doesn't linger for too long, where you can take in everything from that moment. It's just like, "What the fuck was in that tub?"

Joe: What would you say is the minimum age that you can watch this film?

Stephan: For my own future kids?

Joe: Based on your own personal experience, and based on how you feel you would be as a parent, what age would be okay?

Stephan: I feel like I would be okay if my—

Joe: Infant daughter.

Stephan: No! If my child saw this in their early adolescence, I'd be okay with that.

Allison: What age is that?

Joe: Yeah, commit to an age here.

Stephan: Like twelve years old.

Allison: My gut instinct was thirteen.

Stephan: I would think—I'm just saying about myself—my parents would like to think—if you're reading this, I'm sorry—possibly my parents, when I was twelve, thought I was this saint child, that had never seen anything bloody, or gory, or bad. But we had access to stuff in our youth, and it's only going to get worse. So if my kid can make it to twelve without seeing this movie, that would be a huge victory.

Allison: Or seeing anything worse than this on the internet, then I've done a good job!

Stephan: They're going to see Oldboy before this. [laughter]

Joe: Oh no.

Pam: I feel like seeing this as a teenager, I would be scared of different things than I'm scared of now.

Joe: What would Teenage Pam be scared of?

Pam: I think just the gore stuff? But now, I'm watching it and scared of being stalked, and being the victim of a serial killer. Back then, I would be scared of the Hannibal stuff, with the guards.

Joe: So when I walked in the house earlier while you and Willow were upstairs, and you yelled, "Is that you?!" that was your fear?

Pam: Yeah.

Joe: That I was a serial killer?

Pam: It wouldn't be a serial killer.

Allison: Just a regular killer. [laughter]

Pam: It would be someone who's looking to rob us for money to buy drugs.

Joe: ...We can't end the interview on that note.

Allison: "This interview brought to you by the Port Richmond Neighborhood Association."

Joe: What's something positive we can take away from Silence of the Lambs? Let's end on that.

Pam: They caught Buffalo Bill?

Allison: I think Clarice is a great portrayal of a woman character.

Joe: Sixth best hero of all time!

Allison: I don't know if I'd categorize this movie as a "feminist movie," but I feel like she's smart, she's capable, she's strong. She does, by herself, what so many men in boots cannot accomplish. The scene when all the cops are in the hallway, about to enter the room where Hannibal was kept, and they're doing all these evasive maneuvers. And they look kind of silly? They're kind of bumbling around. But Clarice has approached Lecter by herself, unarmed, on her own. She takes down Buffalo Bill in the darkness, on her own.

Stephan: I think, for me, the example that's the strongest is that crosscut scene, the climax. You see all these bumbling FBI agents, guns toted, a decoy flower box, agents in a plane—

Allison: All the SWAT gear, storming the house—

Stephan: —like, "We're going in!" And they ring the doorbell. You think it's Buffalo Bill's house, but it's an empty house. And then there's Clarice.

Allison: Who's just showing up to ask an old lady some questions.

Stephan: And she's the one who has the epic encounter. And she totally handles the whole situation on her own.

Allison: Juxtaposing that to a scene early in the movie, where they're doing a drill, and she gets shot. She doesn't check the corner, her partner does fine, whatever. Watching that kind of growth, from this cadet who's still learning, sitting on the dryer with her roommate talking about the case, to then taking down the actual serial killer, on her own. Crazy. It's empowering!

Stephan: I think it's a good movie about growth. Even though it's a short amount of time, you definitely see Clarice grow a lot.

Joe: From out of her cocoon.

Stephan: She's a skull-headed butterfly.

Allison: It's all shrouded in death, but she emerges in the end.

Tuesday, November 19, 2019

Your Favorite Movie: Oldboy, with Sunny K.


Welcome back to Your Favorite Movie, where a friends discusses exactly what the title indicates he or she will discuss. I've been writing this column for fifteen years, and after the first eleven years, it felt like home.

In a private prison of his own making this week is Sunny K*********, a former friend-of-a-friend whom I'm lucky to now just call a friend. I've maybe only hung out with Sunny a couple dozen times in my life, but I've grown to appreciate the times we do hang.

Okay, enough of the sappy shit, let's talk about gritty revenge stories! Sunny's favorite movie of all time is the South Korean thriller Oldboy. The less said about that movie in this paragraph, the better, mostly because I don't want to spoil shit for you and ruin it.

I was surprised how many of my friends had seen this shit, and so it was okay when travel plans forced Stephan C****** (who has appeared here before) and Sean E**** (in his first appearance, if you don't count album reviews) at hammer-point to take part in a movie interview. The gang hung out at a brewery before a book club meeting... actually, I should clarify. The place we were at didn't sell beer until 10 AM, and we were there at 9 AM.

So you are about to read the first completely sober Your Favorite Movie interview, which, let's be real, is probably a good thing. I need to chill a little bit. And the interview still went great! Maybe I don't need alcohol after all! (It helps when you surround yourself with smart, well-spoken friends!)

Anyways, here's our discussion, transcribed with Sunny's permission, and edited slightly (but honestly not as much as usual because, again, sobriety).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sunny: After that movie closes, and the credit scene runs, what's the first thing that goes through your head.

Joe: Honestly, this was my reaction—"What?!"

Sunny: When did you see it?

Joe: A couple days ago, for the first time. I had never heard of it before you said it was your favorite.

Sunny: Has it hung with you? Has it crawled back into your thoughts, and you try to push it away, like the boogie monster?

Joe: Yeah, sure. That's a good way of describing it.

Sunny: That's definitely how I felt when I first saw it. To give you the context—I moved here in high school, so I didn't have a lot of friends. I found a friend in one kid, Kevin, who really loved Asian films, for some reason. And yes... he's Asian. [laughter] He, I, and one other friend would watch old Bruce Lee films, we loved Jackie Chan, we liked Gorgeous. But like a drug, Kevin needed harder and harder stuff. So he started to bring some real experimental Asian film in. And so one day—and this is 2004, so a year after the movie came out and had won the Grand Prix or whatever—he said, "I heard about this Korean film, Oldboy. It's supposed to be good." It's all he said about it. So it's the three of us, all fifteen years old, and his eleven-year-old sister, all sitting there watching this movie.

Joe: That's worse, that you watched it with his sister!

Sunny: Oh, it's terrible. Before we even got to the climax, just during the sex scenes, she was like, "Kevin, what are you doing? What did you pick?!" But our little minds were in such a place of... movies were not "art" to us yet, and this was one of those big movies that transformed our little brains into seeing movies not just as stuff like Lion King—which was great—or The Matrix—which was great—but as something that could be more. That they could evoke emotions that were in a deeper, and maybe even a darker, place than was before. And after that, all three of us—his sister left halfway through the movie, she didn't even see the climax, which is probably for the best.

Joe: So she didn't see the brother-sister nipple scene.

Sunny: She didn't see the nip scene, didn't see... all the good shit. [laughter] The three of us... normally, after a movie, we'd go get food, hang out for a while. After this, we all just kind of stood up, had your reaction, like, "what..." and just quietly went home. And for the next days and weeks, it just kept crawling back into our minds, until we slowly started recommending it to other people. And they all had the same reaction too. A little disgust. A little disappointment in recommending it to them in the first place. [laughter] But also, a slight opening in their third eye. So it stayed with me since then. And that was fifteen years ago! And "fifteen years" is a theme in this movie. And pretty much every five years, I've seen it, and had a different experience with it, but it always leaves me changed in some small but significant way.

Joe: What's the line? "After eleven years... it felt like home." Maybe it took you eleven years to think of this as your favorite movie?

Sunny: It kind of did. And I think it wasn't until—and a lot of your other guests have pointed this out well—it's a little bit of a bullshit question to ask someone what their favorite movie is, I think.

Joe: Sure! Absolutely.

Sunny: That's capitalism talk!

[laughter]

Joe: Don't get me started, man!

Sunny: Oh, don't get me started!

Joe: Jesus.

Sunny: It's been interesting watching you, for the past fifteen weeks, through this blog, by the way. You've also seemed to evolve with the art.

Joe: Just like, tearing my hair out more and more?

Sunny: Yeah.

Joe: Wait till you read Wolf of Wall Street. It's just an hour-long argument about, "How can you look up to Jordan Belfort as the hero?!"

Sunny: Gordon Gecko, watch the good shit!

Joe: So this is a "friendship movie" to you, personally?

Sunny: Well when you say it like that, it's weird, but... yes. My "coming-of-age movie" is watching another movie.

Joe: I dig it. Would your friend Kevin feel the same way about this movie?

Sunny: I was about to ask him yesterday when I saw him. I was going to play it casual, like, "Hey... Oldboy was on, and I saw the whole thing. Have you seen it since? What are your thoughts on it?" [laughter] But I didn't have the nerve. I might still.

Joe: "Have you talked to your sister recently?" [laughter]

Sunny: I'll also say this about Oldboy. I was thinking about your question, "What makes a movie 'good'?" As an old consultant, I made this framework of categories. A movie that is someone's "favorite" should fulfill at least two of these three categories—

Joe: I appreciate that you thought about this.

Sunny: The movie should be good, in the sense that it's entertaining. It shouldn't drag, it shouldn't be boring. This movie does that—it's exciting, it's thrilling. I think that it changed action movies a little bit. Pre-Oldboy, you had you Armageddon days, and your Matrices, sort of these big, blockbuster actions. Post-Oldboy, you still have those of course, but you also see these John Wicks, these Takens, a sort of "one man thriller" things. I think it's fun. It's a fun movie to watch. Maybe a little too fun?

Joe: Ahhh... sure.

Sunny: But it's fun to watch! I think it is important for cinema. For South Korean cinema. It gave us a renaissance. From that, there was Little Drummer Girl, this guy made The Handmaiden in 2016, which was very good. Snowpiercer—and that is an anti-capitalist movie. That's a South Korean guy. I don't think it we would have that without Oldboy.

Stephan: Stoker is another one that he did.

Joe: This is all the same director?

Sunny: It's a couple different directors, South Korean directors. But it opened South Korean cinema to American audiences, and I understand that this is not a word you'd use for this particular movie, but—in an "approachable" way. Most other Asian cinema, the other hard shit that Kevin was bringing, was almost drivel to an American audience.

Joe: Interesting.

Sunny: So I think that's important. And then we want to talk about the hallway scene. I still think that that is the finest action scene in cinema.

Joe: That was pretty fucking wild.



Sunny: I wanna hear some thoughts on this.

Stephan: I think that scene alone is what really pulled me into that movie. I saw this in college, sophomore year maybe. very drunk. [laughter] I think it was at Kyle A****'s, pre-B9B [a La Salle on-campus townhouse], so that might tell you the setting. I was mad drunk, watched this movie very late at night, and that was the one thing that stuck with me. I remember, at the end of the movie, I was like, "What is this movie?" And I remember the next day, I was like, "Man, that plot was really fucked up... but that action scene was so cool." The one take, everyone down the hallway...

Joe: It highlights how gritty the movie is. It's brutal.

Stephan: Like Sunny, I grew up watching a lot of Bruce Lee films. Martial arts. There's some gritty stuff, but a lot of it is stylized choreography. This was very brutal. He's just taking a hammer and whaling on these guys.

Sunny: You see him get tired. When they put the knife in him, and everyone stops because they think he's dead. They're all just breathing heavily. It would be what a real gang fight might feel like.

Stephan: Yeah, it has such an authenticity, that feels really cool. And you touched on it earlier, how before Oldboy, movies weren't doing that. With that hallway scene, they kind of replicate that in the first season of Daredevil.

Joe: I guess I did hear about that.

Sunny: Pretty lame! [laughter]

Stephan: I didn't finish Daredevil. I had some issues with the story moving forward. But the first season has such good action sequences, because they are gritty and authentic.

Joe: Did [the showrunners] say that they were influenced by Oldboy?

Stephan: They didn't, but you can kind of see. You can line them up, shot-for-shot, and it's kind of the same thing.

Joe: I always appreciate any kind of one-shot take in anything. Was that the first of it's kind in action?

Sunny: As far as I know. And I'm not a scholar in this. As far as I understand it, that was the most ambitious one-shot action take in that sense. Children of Man has that one-shot action take when they're in the car. As far as a fight scene like this? This is probably the first, and I would say still the best.

Joe: I think the fact that he's using a hammer might put it over the top for me.

Sunny: The hammer is very fun. It makes it very unique. And you get some of those Asian cinema flairs. When he breaks into thing, he threatens the first guy with the hammer, and it pauses and does the [camera movement] down to his forehead. You see some of that in Tarantino's work. I think he's influenced by some of this Asian cinema.

Joe: He was the one that championed it at the Cannes movie festival or whatever, right? When he was making Kill Bill, around that time?

Sunny: Yup. Kill Bill is very fun action movie.

Stephan: It's not until you mentioned it—Kill Bill was on a couple weekends ago, very randomly. Now that you mention it, I kind of forgot there was all those little Asian flairs.

Sunny: The fast zooms and stuff. And then my third category is that a movie has to be meaningful, to me. So my short list—which I would say, but it'll just get cut from the final transcription, so I'll save everyone the time—they're all meaningful to me, in some emotional way. Or relate to me in some particular emotion, in some deep way that I would not have been able to get to otherwise. This movie hits two that I thought were interesting. One was the idea of "voyeurism." The whole movie is three layers of voyeurism. The inciting event—"Oh Dae-su seeing the nip" scene, the sexy nip scene, which starts this whole progression of events. But then, the movie doesn't say it outright—maybe they do say it—Woo-jin has been watching Oh Dae-su pretty much exclusively for fifteen years. Obsessing over him in a voyeuristic way.

Joe: "You were the subject I'm studying," I think he said.

Sunny: Exactly. And then afterward, with him, his life has lost all meaning, and he dies. I still haven't quite cracked what that means, or if there's anything deeper to it. But it's interesting take on, what would it take for someone who had unlimited power to be a voyeur for their whole life, how might that warp him? I think it's interesting.

Joe: So when you're putting it in the category of "this is meaningful to you in a personal way," you're not saying that you're a voyeur.

Sunny: I'm saying that, for me, there is half of all human emotions that I'm locked out of. If I was in a Psych 101 thing, they would say, "He just doesn't have the capacity to understand this." Voyeurism is one of them. And the other big one is revenge. Revenge is interesting.

Joe: Yeah, I guess I did want to get into that.

Sunny: Let's get into the revenge stuff.

Joe: So it's a movie about revenge, right?

Sunny: It's like Count of Monte Cristo on steroids. On cool Asian steroids. Great revenge film. It's this long-form mediation on: "If you got obsessed with revenge, and revenge consumed you, what would that turn a person into?" All we see is monsters. The only sympathetic character in the movie is Mi-do. Think about her. She's three, her dad gets kidnapped. Allegedly her dad kills her mom and then leaves. She's by herself for eighteen years, and then she's hypnotized, and having sex with her dad... and that's it!!

Joe: [looks around the coffee shop to see if anyone heard that]

[laughter]

Sunny: "Oh, they're talking Oldboy!"

[laughter]

Sunny: So we see Woo-jin obsessed with revenge.

Joe: Was his revenge justified?

Sunny: Obviously not! Oh Dae-su did a little peeping, and all he said was "I think those two were nipping, don't tell anyone." Really, the friend was the one that did the bad thing—I mean, I guess he gets it in the end too—and he's the one that spread the rumor around!

Joe: When Oh Dae-su gets out of prison, and he is locked into getting his revenge... is that justified?

Sunny: I think justification is a hard thing to know. That's an ontological and moral question, as to what's "justified." The movie does a good job framing it in that one scene, where he first meets Woo-jin, and he has the hammer next to his temple, and Woo-jin says, "What is more important to you, the revenge, or knowing the truth?" At that point, he choose the truth, right? He could've just killed him. Woo-jin says the line, "Revenge can be good for you. It can heal you." The flip of it is, at the end of the movie, the final act, Mi-do says, "Let's just leave. You know what happened, we're together, let's just fucking leave." And he could have! But he says, "Revenge has consumed me." Had he left, had he realized, "Revenge is destroying me, and pushing me down this ladder." Or, "The person I'm fighting is that, and I'm becoming that." The Nietzschean "if you fight monsters, you become monsters too." He didn't turn away. For him, it was necessary. For me, personally, I've never felt slighted by anyone.

Joe: Yeah, let's talk about you. You're not a vengeful person?

Sunny: I've never had feelings of revenge. I can't even remember the last time I was angry. And yet I know it's such a poor thing in art—much like video games and the media I saw as a kid were revenge-driven fantasies. In the real world too! Medieval conquests were fueled by revenge. The first al-Assad, when he was betrayed by Kissinger, he was said to be motivated by revenge. Creating ISIS, creating al-Qaeda, all this shit—one man's desire for revenge. I've never felt that. So how can normal humans like me feel something that I've never had a touch to, and this piece of art lets me see that through these angles and these crystals that I couldn't otherwise access?

Joe: So you're not relating to this, but this is like a case study for you, I guess.

Sunny: That's a good way to put it. It's a case study into revenge, through the medium of movie.

Joe: I guess that was one thing I was thinking about after I watched the movie, examining my own self. Like, do I feel like I am a vengeful person? I feel like the movie clearly makes the case that revenge is a bad thing, and people motivated by revenge are ultimately lead to terrible ends. Like you were saying, ISIS was created. Or, you're going to chop your own tongue out when you're that consumed by revenge. I guess I was self-reflecting, whether I was ever consumed by revenge.

Sunny: Do you have any nemeses?

Joe: Yeah, I dunno. I... I feel like I had one in college...

Sean: [laughter]

Sunny: You know who he's talking about? Say more.

Joe: Our R.A., back in freshman year, I guess had a problem with some of my actions. And I was a drunk shithead teenager.

Sunny: Sure.

Joe: And this from the vantage point of being thirty now, and being well removed from the situation. But, at the time, it was—"This dude is a piece of shit, how can we get revenge?"

Sunny: Give me an example, one instigating incident. You guys were drinking, and he busted you guys up?

Joe: Basically. Sean came up to my dorm room. We were playing beer pong on St. Patrick's Day. I guess Mehow had a vendetta against me, and came up, and he wrote us up for drinking Natty Lights.

Sean: I actually didn't get written up at all.

Joe: Well good for you, man. [laughter] How'd you not get written up?!

Sean: I don't know. I was literally drinking a beer. I guess he still liked me at that point? And he was like, "Sean, if you pour it out, I won't write you up." I mean, I didn't pour it out either, I finished the beer...

Stephan: I will say... I do really feel like Mehow was out for you. I do think it was a personal thing.

Joe: I think that was legitimately the case. My ex-girlfriend at the time said, "Mehow told me he's going to try to write you up."

Sean: Yeah, he was jonesing for you.

Joe: But, okay, so this was...

Sunny: So you wanted revenge?

Joe: At the time, I did. Nothing satisfactory. I was spitting on his door, every time I passed it.

Sean: I peed on his door.

Sunny: Peed on his door? That's a significant act of revenge.

Sean: I wasn't angry for getting written up. I was just drunk. [laughter]

Joe: It didn't feel good, the spitting. He probably saw a loogie dripping down his door—

Sunny: "Someone spit on my door. This wasn't here before."

Joe: —and he probably knew it was me. The head of La Salle Security called me, and was like, "Are you spitting on Mehow's door?" And I said, "No."

Sunny: You denied it.

Joe: And he was like, "We're going to put cameras in that hallway!" And I was like, "Go ahead, man. Everybody hates him." Okay, but... this is not...

Sunny: When you spit on his door, did you feel a little better?

Joe: No! I didn't! And, ya know, this is still me telling this story as a nineteen-year-old. 30-year-old Joe, I've already reflected on this enough to know that I was in the wrong for a lot of that.

Sunny: Maybe. But Sean wasn't written up, so it does raise some questions... [laughter]

Joe: Regardless. Regardless of what his intentions were, or whatever, I was in the wrong for a lot of it. Thinking about it now, I feel like shit about it. I've come to terms with the idea that maybe I was the bad guy in this situation. Maybe being motivated by revenge for his alleged "crimes" against me wasn't necessarily a good thing, at the time. And still, talking about it now, I'm dreading transcribing this. I've already written about this. I've already... somebody's going to read that my "revenge story" was about Mehow and think that it's fucking pathetic! It was fucking twelve years ago!

Sean: Is it pathetic—

Joe: It's fucking pathetic.

Sean: —or is that a positive sign for you, though, that that was the only story you could think of as "revenge"?

Joe: I mean, I guess.

Sean: I think it speaks volumes of you as an individual, and your interactions with others.

Sunny: That's true. If you had told me a revenge story where like, "And yeah, I had the gun pointed at him through the window, but then I put it away..." [laughter] I'd be like, "Well, yeah Joe, I think you have some interpersonal issues."

Joe: I dunno man.

Sunny: You spit on the guy's door, it was college... so he couldn't have been more than a couple years older?

Joe: Yeah, two years older.

Sunny: Twenty years old. It's not like he was some zen master and you were some dumb freshman.

Joe: It'd be interesting to get his perspective on this.

Sunny: What if he has been planning revenge for the last twelve years?!

Joe: There's no fucking way. Well... maybe...

Sunny: And when you're 35, he's just gonna pull down your pants at work? [laughter] I dunno, some wild embarrassment.

Joe: Like I said, I already wrote about this, and I sent him the essay I wrote on Facebook, like, "Hey man, I want you to know I've thought about this, and I know I was in the wrong for a lot of it. Let's grab a beer next time you're in Philly." He didn't respond, maybe just because Facebook is weird sending messages when you're not Facebook friends. Mehow, if you're reading this right now, let's sit down and talk about your favorite movie.

Sunny: A second offer! A beer and a movie!

Joe: I dunno. How do you guys feel? Have you ever been revenge-motivated?

Stephan: No, not really.

Joe: Everyone's too nice here. I picked the wrong crew to talk about revenge fantasies.

Sunny: Bunch of lame-os!

Sean: I've had thoughts of revenge against people. But I've never acted on it.

Sunny: Are they still seething in you?

Sean: Not really...

Sunny: What's an example?

Sean: A good example... So there was this girl that I dated in high school, and her dad was such an epic asshole to me all the time.

Sunny: What kind of stuff would he do?

Sean: He described me as a "bullshitter that wasn't going to amount to anything."

Joe: That's why you got your Ph.D., to prove him wrong? [laughter]

Sean: There is part of me that... if I ever saw him, I'd be like, "Fuck you!" Ya know? But no, so he was a doctor, or surgeon. I saw him years after I broke up with this girl, when my dad was in the ICU. We locked eyes, and he totally knew me, and didn't say shit to me. It was just like, "You're such a dick! Fuck you!"

Joe: But had you told him "fuck you," would you feel better after that?

Sean: I don't know. That's the thing. I've thought of all different ways to get back at the guy, and I guess if I did... he would know that I gave that much of a shit?

Sunny: If he just didn't care about you for the past fifteen years, then you've kind of won.

Sean: Exactly. I dunno... I often operate on the idea that my feelings are mine, and not anyone else's, and when I share them with someone, it becomes theirs too. Especially in a revenge context, it's like I'm giving something up, by making him aware that he, at the time, bothered me that much.

Sunny: Does it concern you one way or the other whether he cares or not? Or would you just rather live in the ambiguity?

Sean: At this point, no. You know?

Sunny: Well, I don't have revenge feelings, so I don't know what you mean.

Sean: At this point, I could care less. If he still thought about me, I'd kind of feel sad for the guy. [laughter] It'd be like, get a hobby! At the time, it would've meant something. Back in the day.

Joe: I guess that's similar in the movie, how Oh Dae-su started a rumor, kind of innocently—he certainly didn't want someone to commit suicide over it...

Sunny: Right, he was just a twelve-year-old kid being like, "I think I saw some nip stuff."

Joe: And that's why, after he found out the truth, he was like, "This is why I've been in prison for fifteen years?!" And we as the audience agree with him: "That's the reason you locked this dude up in a private prison for fifteen years?!" That's kind of pathetic, that he thought about it for that long!

Sunny: If you told somebody, "I'll give you all the money and all the resources in the world, do the most revenge thing, what's the most revenge thing you can do?" I can't think of a plot more outrageous than this. And exactly to your point—you go all the way to the logical conclusion. What's the most revenge thing you can do? If it was like a meter, that you could fill up to a 100 points, what would you do, and how would you feel afterwards? Uh... you'd just kill yourself. You put your whole life into it, and then you did it... and then what?

Joe: I don't want to say it was "tragic," because it was the villain who killed himself...

Sunny: I mean, it's tragic in a Greek Tragedy sense. Both are flawed characters, and they both fall at the end.

Joe: I guess he was called "Oh Dae-su" in reference to Oedipus? Speaking of Greek tragedies.

Sunny: There does seem to be a lot Oedipus references. At the start, they do say that "Oh Dae-su" roughly translates to "getting through one day at a time." Which is also a theme of this movie. Getting through the fifteen years one day at a time, and then afterwards, you have the five days to do whatever.

Joe: It was the second movie in a trilogy, right?

Sunny: A very loose trilogy. More of an anthology of three "revenge films."

Joe: Have you seen the other ones?

Sunny: I've seen the other ones. They're good...

Joe: Similar themes?

Sunny: Yeah, they're just lesser versions of this one.

Stephan: The plots are not nearly as compelling. I think Oldboy does a good job in that a lot of the elements make you sympathetic toward Oh Dae-su. I feel like, while I can't relate directly to his feelings, all the feelings of revenge, I do feel like there's something about this movie that feels relatable, in a weird sense. I think Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance and Lady Vengeance are the other two?

Sunny: Yup.

Stephan: Something about them, there's no real human connection. They just kind of exist almost as "revenge porn."

Joe: I read Roger Ebert's review of Oldboy—he gave it four out of four stars—and that's kind of the point that he made about this movie. How it was a thriller, but the thrills had a purpose. In retrospect, that's probably the reason I had a problem with The Last Boy Scout, that I talked about. It was just thrills for thrills' sake. You understood the motivations of Oh Dae-su in this. Whether you agreed with it or not is something we've already discussed. You understood why he wanted this revenge, and why the fireworks are happening in this movie. I know you said you watched the remake. Is that something that was lacking in that, or what?

Sunny: Oh yeah. Let's talk about the remake for a second. Has anyone seen the remake?

Joe: You might be the only one.

Sunny: A Spike Lee joint. I'll put this out there now. Obviously Spike Lee is talented. His directing is great. But this guy fucking blew it! [laughter]

Joe: How so? What made the remake bad, and the original good?

Sunny: Part of the brilliance of movies and art, and my lack of words for it, is I have a hard time explaining art, and finding any meaningful way to compare them. I just know, sitting down for the two and a half hours of Oldboy 2013 were just miserable. I was just having a bad fucking time.

Joe: Was that just because someone remade your favorite movie?

Sunny: No. I will pose this to the group. Are there any good remakes that you love?

Joe: Hmm... A Star Is Born?

Sunny: Okay, I'll give you that.

Sean: Baz Luhrmann's 1996 version of Romeo + Juliet?

[laughter]

Joe: "Tune in next month, when we discuss Sean E****'s favorite movie."

Sunny: My point is that remakes inevitably suck.

Joe: A majority, for sure.

Sunny: Two problems in Oldboy's remake. One, it just felt like no one cared.

Joe: The characters, or the people making it?

Sunny: The people making it. And then the characters, as an extension of them. And I'll say this—and this is a bit of an aside—part of the reason I first liked Oldboy in 2004 is that it's fun to see a movie when you don't know any of the actors. If you see a George Clooney movie, you're always like, yeah, as good as an actor as he is, he's still George Clooney, just a dude with swagger. If you see people you don't know who are acting well, I can almost imagine this is a story somewhere else, and these are actual people doing it.

Joe: So, when Josh Brolin and Elizabeth Olsen fucked, that took you out of it?

Sunny: Yeah, "What is this, The Avengers?!"

[laughter]

Sunny: Josh Brolin fucking phones it in. Fat Josh Brolin is just him on water-bloat, and then he loses the water-bloat when he gets fit. And there's these subtle differences. Like, when he gets out of prison in 2013, for some reason, the Asian woman who hypnotizes him is there, even though there's no hypnotism plot in this one. She's just in the movie for shits. And he chases after her, and he catches up to her, and he's about to kill her or whatever. And the only reason she gets away is some random football bros come up to him and just deck him in the face. Just sucker punch him. Because... that happens in the real world?

Joe: Don't jinx it, man. We're in Phoenixville right now. You never know.

Sunny: So then Josh Brolin gets up, and straight-up murders these guys. He smashes one guys ankle, he's breaking heads over knees. The original Oldboy is over-the-top where it's fun, but it still keeps it gritty. It somehow makes a 50-versus-1 fight work, because it's in a very constrained corridor, it's in South Korea, they're thugs, he's been training for fifteen years. But with Josh Brolin, he just becomes Thanos when he leaves the prison, and he's straight-up murdering people. And then they change the incest storyline. Instead of just a little nip-slip, and a "hysterical pregnancy"—maybe Woo-jin's making that up, that's an interesting thing too—but in the remake, his name is Joe Sutherland, or something like that [Editor's note: Joe Doucett]. Boring-ass Joe. Sorry.

Joe: It's alright. It's a boring name.

Sunny: And he goes to the greenhouse... and Josh Brolin is a full-ass alcoholic. Like, obviously Oh Dae-su is a drunk in this movie, but in the remake, he's an alcoholic—

Joe: Even after he gets out of prison?

Sunny: All the time. All the time. Fully drunk. So in the flashback, when he's thirteen, he sneaks vodka behind the air conditioning unit, he's drinking behind the greenhouse, and he sees the girl fucking her dad, who's a professor at the place. And they're in plain view. And he jizzes inside her or whatever... And so obviously he spreads that rumor, and everyone calls her a whore, and they move to Germany or whatever. What doesn't happen is that the Woo-jin character never sleeps with his sister to have the inciting event. Then that whole family is like the Aristocrats—they're all fucking. The inciting event is a flashback to the Woo-jin character being like, "I love my dad." And they show this short scene where the dad loads up a shotgun, and goes in the daughter's room. The daughter starts stripping her clothes off, and the dad blows her away. And then he goes downstairs, and the wife comes out, and she starts stripping, and he blows her away. He takes the shotgun, and loads two more shells, and he goes to the son, the Woo-jin character, who starts taking his clothes off, and the dad blows him away... but I guess he misses? And then he kills himself. So then you get back to the present-day, and the Woo-jin character is like, "You took all that away from me." The Joe character, rightfully so, is like, "I didn't do any of that shit, man. I'm sorry your dad was fucking everyone, but what the hell does that have to do with me? What does that that have to do with anything?"

[laughter]

Sunny: And you as the audience are like, "I don't care about any of these characters, the plot doesn't make sense." It's just grotesque and weird for no reason at all. And then the last bit is that they change Oh Dae-su's motivation from one that's consumed by revenge, and what does that mean, how that looks, to him just feeling bad about being a bad dad. Even though, in the Korean one, he's never shown as a bad dad. He's a drunk, but he got his daughter a present on her birthday, he's excited to see her. In the remake, one of the opening scenes is him talking to his ex-wife, like, "I don't fucking care about my daughter! She's three, she's not going to remember this anyway!" But then in jail, he's like, "You know what, I do care about my daughter." And I think that's a very American, dumbed-down thing to do. Like, "Oh, the only thing that can motivate a man is love for his kid." Of course that's motivating, but I've seen that so many times that it's not interesting, versus the vengeance thing. And so that carries on through the whole movie, and that doesn't sell you either. So... Spike Lee, if you're reading this—fuck off!

[laughter]

Joe: I definitely had no motivation to watch that version of the movie.

Sunny: Don't. Don't. Unless you're a masochist like me, just don't do it.

Joe: How about the manga comics that it was based on?

Sunny: I haven't read those. That's the next frontier, I guess. Have you read them, Stephan?

Stephan: I haven't, no. I didn't even know it was based off a manga.

Sunny: Everything's based off manga. Shakespeare was based off manga, just a little known fact.

Stephan: Well, I have read those. [laughter]

Joe: Did he eat the octopus in the Josh Brolin version?

Sunny: No. Who would man up for that?

Joe: Not even CGI?

Sunny: No.

Joe: I appreciated the IMDB trivia saying that the Oh Dae-su actor said a Buddhist prayer before he ate all the octopus. He felt so bad about eating all that octopus.

Sunny: You gotta respect that.

Joe: That probably grossed me out more than the incest.

Sean: ...Eating an octopus grosses you out more than incest?

Joe: I was exaggerating to make a point.

Sunny: Allegedly.

Joe: Here's something I found kind of interesting. Apparently the Virginia Tech shooter, the media made a big deal—as they are wont to do—about there being a picture that exists of the dude holding a hammer.

Sunny: Oldboy-style?

Joe: I guess that was his favorite movie, or one of his favorite movies. I'm probably preaching to the choir when I say I don't think Oldboy was the reason...

Sunny: The inspiration for the V-Tech shooting?

Joe: Yeah, that he shot three dozen people. But do you have any thoughts about someone so villainous appreciating this movie just as much as you do?

Sunny: Um... it doesn't bother me. It's two problems with media under liberal capitalism. One is that you have to turn these villains—like the V-Tech shooter, or Elliot Rodger, or whoever—you have to characterize them in such a way that they were incited by a few events, or a few media pieces, when it's really a much larger system that has impacted them. Further reaching consequences, right? And the other piece—and you're hearing this about Joker right now—"This movie is so dangerous that it's going to incite these white kids to go wild and start killing people." I don't think any average person views art that way. Like, takes art as a meal, and just consumes it, and then makes it their motivating factor. I think there are troubled people who will gravitate their thoughts around it, will use it as a seed to personalize around. But I think that crystallization can't happen without a society that's inherently isolating and alienating, like capitalism is, right?

Joe: Yes.

Sunny: A piece of media can be inciting, but ya know what? The bible can be inciting. Religious texts have been inciting. Any number of things with any sort of doctrine could be inciting. But you need to build a person around the inciting factor. And blaming the inciting factor itself is just playing whack-a-mole. It's not fixing the issue, it's just pushing down art that might actually help people connect, if you look beyond the inciting factors, but doesn't. That's just my thought. I'd love to get your take on it.

Joe: No, it's definitely... the fact that the media would worry about this picture, or show this picture, or even give this dude a time in the spotlight for whatever fucking reason—like, I'm not going to say his name right now, because I don't want his name printed on my blog—the dude's a fucking murderer. His motivation is a concern, but the fact of the matter is, it doesn't really matter if he watched Oldboy, or what he thought about Oldboy. He killed 33 people. It's insane to me that the media would be concerned about a picture of him holding a hammer. I feel like that's irresponsible of the media to even have to delve into what movies he liked, ya know?

Sunny: Right.

Joe: And, it is something that I'm interesting in thinking about. Like I said, I spent a few hours this week transcribing the argument I had with my friend Ant, who was circling around the idea of, "I look up to Jordan Belfort," who is, not a murderer, but absolutely a criminal, and they made that clear in Wolf of Wall Street that he is a shitbag person.

Sunny: Jordan Belfort, like the Joker, is not someone who you're supposed to empathize with.

Joe: Right. So that was—and I was pretty drunk at the time—

Sunny: Tuesday at 1 PM or something?

Joe: ...it was a Sunday morning.

[laughter]

Joe: But it was a very long argument, and I just couldn't get that through my brain, why anyone would think that. How could you watch that movie and still think that that is someone to emulate? In any capacity? So, I guess that is a piece of the Joker argument now. "What if someone watches Joker, and tries to emulate the Joker?" and then, "What if someone watches Oldboy, and tries to emulate the dude from Oldboy?" If that happens, they're definitely missing the point of the movie, for sure. But... I guess it's something that could happen? I guess it's something that you could worry about if you wanted to? But it's not...

Stephan: I don't think that's something that ever actually happens. You had a good point, Sunny. It's easy for the media to say, "Someone shot up this school, someone committed this act," and then they relate it to Joker, they relate it to Oldboy. That's easy. That's something that the average person can hear and just let it wash over them, like, "Okay, now all these movies are bad." Or, "This child was playing a violent video game, and that's why he did this." That's a cop out. It allows you to not challenge yourself to think about all the other things in society that are shaping these people. Yes, it could be a catalyst for them to take the next step. But this isn't the beginning of those violent thoughts. A lot of these people have histories of underlying mental health issues. They have really fractured family dynamics. That's not because of Oldboy! These are things that existed before 2003 for some people. I always get frustrated when they try to say certain pieces of art, certain content we're consuming, is the reason for violent actions. Sure, they can be a catalyst. They can continue to help that pot grow. But it already existed.

Joe: They're used as a scapegoat. People don't want to consider that society itself is fucked. It's easier to say—

Sunny: It's easier to blame a symptom than to say something is wrong in the root cause.

Sean: But it's also through violence, historically, that humans have found meaning in their lives. "You're gonna remember me because I did this thing." And because riding into battle isn't as glory-filled as it used to be—I don't know any soldier who did anything notable in the Iraq or Afghanistan wars—but if you feel like you are angry at all these people, and want your life to mean something, but you feel like a loser, one way to feel powerful is to exercise violence over others. If anything, it would have been better if we had better gun laws, because then he would've run around hitting people with a hammer, and he would've done less damage.

Sunny: Right. If someone went on a knife-spree—yes, that would be bad, but it wouldn't be nearly as bad.

Sean: Not three-dozen-people bad.

Sunny: Exactly. This level of hyperviolence can only happen if you live in the gun country. The corporation-owned gun country. Two points. One—how ludicrous would it be if the guy's favorite show was Three's Company? And he had big diaries all about Three's Company, and the media was like, "Three's Company is corrupting our youth"? "This arrangement of two women and one man pretending to be gay is corrupting our youth!" [laughter]

Joe: I think it's a matter of, are you going to take this mass murderer's word for it? Whatever he states is the reason? Does that mean it's the actual reason he did this?

Sunny: "Oh yeah, the mass murderer, he must be completely trustworthy."

Joe: Right! So that's another issue. He didn't straight-up say, "Oldboy is the reason I'm getting revenge on these people who have supposedly slighted me." But had he said that, it still wouldn't make it true.

Sean: It's like the guy who shot Reagan, who thought The Catcher in the Rye was speaking to him. I've read that book a bunch of times, and never once—

Sunny: "A bunch of phonies! I gotta kill the phonies too!"

[laughter]

Sunny: The second point on this is... the Jordan Belfort thing is interesting, because I've also met a lot of pretty smart people—sometimes total idiots, but a good mix of people—who empathize with Gordon Gekko, with Jordan Belfort, who will... like, Masters from Penn who will be like, "Yeah, greed is good. Greed is motivating force in society." To me, that is a product of the society itself. We're seeing now the intergenerational effect of neoliberal capitalism forcing thoughts to—kind of like Sean said, there's no more riding into glory in battle, but that social trend has continued, and now you've tied it to economics. You need to have a job, you need to do really well, you need to be productive, even to live and not be homeless. That's base stakes now. So all that tied together, the wanting to be the top of the hierarchy, the biggest and the best, and seeing the world formed as a winner-take-all, dog-eat-dog world, forces you to have to reflect on that. If you look at that picture long enough, and believe it long enough, it's easier for you to be like, "Yes, that's true, that's what I believe too." You have to be able to go against that system, and force yourself to think, "The world would be better if we were more cooperative." But that's a fundamental change in principles. It's not reaffirmed by society. So it doesn't surprise me that these people exist. But yes... I also get frustrated by it.

Joe: I mean... I'm glad that no one is empathizing with any character in this movie now.

Sunny: I empathize with the internet cafĂ© owner! Just this dude, his friend goes missing for fifteen years, and comes back, and he gets stabbed to death.

Joe: But he was the one that perpetuated the rumor, right?

Sunny: Listen. It was just boyhood talk! Just childhood talk!

Joe: Would you consider this a "cult" movie?

Sunny: A little bit. It's not... I've seen this in your previous interviews. Say there's a movie that 99% of people have watched, that still means that three and a half million Americans haven't watched it. Like, I've never seen Wizard of Oz. I would say most people would say "everyone's watched that." So, for something to be a cult movie, maybe one in ten people, or less, have to have watched it. It's probably around there. But then, we went to the Poconos house, and I found out that everyone fucking watched it. You watched it, Brian watched it, Sam watched it...

Joe: Right. I was surprised. I had never heard of it, and then asking you guys [Sean and Stephan] if you wouldn't mind talking about it, it was like, "We've all seen it."

Sean: I was surprised this morning when everyone said they'd seen it. I saw it in high school, and I almost have never met someone who also has seen it.

Sunny: Part of it is maybe you don't want to say you saw it? Especially when you're younger.

Joe: It might also have to do with the people we typically associate with? My friends are the type of people who watch a lot of movies.

Stephan: We do consume similar kinds of content. So it did not strike me as weird that a lot of people in our group had already seen it. If I went to work, and mentioned this movie, there would be far less people that had seen it. [laughter]

Joe: I was watching this at work, and had to hide it a little bit. "What the fuck is that dude watching? Tentacle porn?" [laughter] But I guess the whole idea of "this is a movie that's special to me and my friends" would fit the idea of "cult movie." It's definitely interesting to me the reasons why people get into certain movies, and hearing about the first time someone has seen the movie, and how that effects your enjoyment of the movie now. I don't know if I've talked to too many people who were like, "Yeah, I don't really remember the first time I watched this." It's always, "I remember when I watched this, and who I was watching it with." It makes it special to look back and remember how one appreciated it at the time.

Sunny: Movies—and songs do this too, and smells—can sort of transport your memory in a very vivid way, back to the past.

Joe: Do you feel like I am doing myself a disservice by even trying to understand that, while not having those same feelings about these movies? Ya know, I watched Oldboy a fucking week ago on my little cell phone at work in between calls. I don't have those same feelings about Oldboy that you do. Am I ever going to be convinced that Oldboy is a special movie? I don't know, because I don't have that... I haven't sat with it for more than a week. So I'm curious, is that necessary for someone to consider a movie their favorite movie. Do you need that? Do you need that nostalgia piece? Or would you actually be able to convince someone, "Watch this movie, it's my favorite movie of all time," and you could find someone that immediately agrees with you in that scenario?

Sunny: I think you could find someone who agrees with you. I think there are other people now, who've seen it more recently, or saw the Korean one after the remake—like, they saw the Josh Brolin one independently, said "this movie blows," and then were told it's based on a better movie, and eventually agreed, "yeah, this movie's great." That happens. But for the purposes of you and this project, and this question more generally, I think generally no. I think about It's a Wonderful Life. I only that movie maybe a couple years ago. And I thought it was great! But obviously, I don't have the same connections that someone would have watching it at Christmastime with their family. But I don't think you need to. I think there's value you can get in hearing about that from somebody else. It's impossible for you to live every single life. So to have all these be your favorite movies in a way that's nostalgic, you'd have to be some sort of Multiple Man. But hearing about it from other people, you can still see the prism of, "Yes, this movie is great, I think it's great"—or, ya know, it sucks—"and I could definitely see how it could be someone's favorite, if it hit them at the right time in their development."

Joe: That's definitely the general thread through all these. This is interview number 23, I think. Everyone has a personal story, and their experiences with the movie. Barely anyone says, "It's just a fucking good movie." Or, "I watched it a few weeks ago, and it seems great." [laughter]

Sunny: Part of it is the people you're interviewing—like Drew is obsessed with movies, right? Everyone you've interviewed is into art, or movies, or something like that. They've thought about it a bit more, so that's part of it. The thing I was wondering when I was reading your blog was—if you're reading this project in five or ten years, do you think anyone's favorite would change? Do you think someone would see a new movie, and it would change? Or maybe they would revisit their movie and say, "Ya know, I hate this movie"?

Joe: I dunno. I think the nature of the question makes people want to choose something that was older. I think there's been two movies from the 2010s that I've talked about so far. The pressure for people to want to say something about themselves makes them to want to choose an older, nostalgic movie.

Sunny: What, they don't want to say, "Yeah, I saw Hangover 2, and I had taken five tabs of L, and it was awesome"? A short interview, not too interesting... [laughter]

Joe: Alright, so we'll end like this. What do you want this movie to say about you? The fact that this is your favorite movie. Someone who's never met you before is reading this. What does this say about Sunny, that we've been talking about this for an hour?

Sunny: I think it would say... that I have a few marbles loose. But, that I'm someone who can appreciate a good action film. And there's very few action films that I like, so if I'm going to recommend one to you, it better be very good. And a good, fun action time. And, two, that I find interesting the concept of "revenge," and the idea that this "obsession" with needing people like me, and also having people dislike me, finding that balance. That's something I've wondered about for a long time. I think this movie does an interesting job of viewing that through the medium of movie.