Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Your Favorite Movie: Clue, with Sarah K.


Good evening. This is another edition of Your Favorite Movie. The object of this game is to find the answer to these three questions:

1) Who did it? This week, I interviewed Sarah K********. I haven't hung out with Sarah probably since she graduated college in 2009. But I had a great time chilling with her back when we were both in jazz band together, and she now lives right around the corner, so yeah, it was time for an interview.

2) Where did it happen? Pam and I met with Sarah in our backyard on a muggy summer night to talk her favorite film. The interview is transcribed below with Sarah's permission, and is lightly edited for clarity.

3) And with what movie? Sarah's favorite movie of all time (if you haven't figured it out already based on this intro's tacky premise) is Clue, a 1985 farcical romp through a classic murder mystery. It's as fast-paced as it is silly, and over the past 34 years, it's become somewhat of a cult classic.

I was glad to have the opportunity to talk about the minutiae of this odd little film. Like the characters in the movie, we started the night sitting around the table making stiff conversation, and ended the discussion accusing each other of murder. And in between, we picked Sarah's brain and figured out, not who done it, but why this is her favorite.

***SPOILER ALERT***

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Joe: Sometimes I start these conversations by asking to kind of run through the plot. I don't necessarily think we have to do that for this movie because they did it themselves at the end of the movie. So if you were to tell me the plot, it would be the third time that someone would be hearing it. Unless you really want to give your—

Pam: Not everyone who's reading this is going to watch the movie.

Joe: True.

Sarah: They better have! If they haven't, they've got a void in their life.

Pam: I just watched it for the first time.

Sarah: Did you love it? Please tell me you loved it.

Pam: I didn't love it.

Joe: She's a skeptic!

Pam: But I want to hear what you have to say about it. It was on Amazon Prime, right? I was looking for something to watch, and was like, "Oh, well I'll just watch this then." It was easy. Joe looked it up on a...?

Joe: I bootlegged it. But yeah, you might have to do a little bit of convincing tonight as to why it was a good movie. I liked it! I will probably be on your side as to whether it was a good versus bad movie. But, as far as the skeptic over here...

Pam: [laughter] I'm not that much of a skeptic!

Joe: Okay, so, why don't... fuck it. Give me a synopsis.

Sarah: A bunch of strangers get invited to a mansion. It's 1950s New England. They arrive and are told that it's to resolve some blackmailing they've been going through. The host is there, and he says that if they all kill the butler, who's trying to resolve the issue, then he'll forgive their...

Joe: Debts? Or future debts I guess?

Sarah: Yeah. And people end up dying, and they try to figure out who did it.

Joe: Slapstick comedy occurs from there. A lot of murders. It's definitely—as far as movies that could be based on something as simple as a fucking board game—it's a pretty great script. There weren't really many other movies that were based on board games that I could think of. So there wasn't really much to compare it to.

Sarah: It's the only one I can think of.

Joe: There's that Battleship one a few years ago.

Sarah: Oh god.

Joe: With, um, Taylor Kitsch? And Rhianna!

Pam: Oh yeah, that's right.

Sarah: Can we agree that this is better than that?

Pam: I've never seen Battleship, but probably, yeah.

Joe: I can assume that it is better than Battleship. And also better than the Ouija board movie. I have to assume that was a terrible horror flick.

Pam: I mean, if you were to pick a board game to make a movie based off of, Clue is the perfect board game for that. Characters that have—there's no other board game that has characters with personalities.

Joe: It's cool to me to think of the challenge it was to have this idea—"base a script on Clue." And then, it was almost a blank slate from there. They got crazy with it!

Pam: Is there a butler character in the board game?

Joe: That was the only one that they created wholesale, I guess.

Sarah: But they do use him in the role of "the instructions." It's not a "butler" in the instructions, but at one point in the movie, he's like, "That's what we're trying to figure out—who killed Mr. Body, with what, and where!"

Pam: And I did like how his name was "Mr. Body."

Joe: And I guess they [also created] the maid... and the cook...

Pam: Do we have Clue?

Joe: I don't think we do. Are you a fan of the Clue board game?

Sarah: I am. [laughter] I have four Clues.

Joe: [laughter] Do you have one that's, like, with pictures of the actors and actresses from this movie? Does that exist?

Sarah: I don't know if that exists. If that exists, I want it! No, I have Master Detective, I have The Simpsons Clue. I was recently given The Golden Girls Clue—

Joe and Pam: [laughter]

Sarah: —because, for some reason, Tom thought that I liked Golden Girls. I've never seen a single episode of Golden Girls. No one dies in that one, though. You're figuring out who stole the last slice of cheesecake!

Joe: I was gonna guess "Who has a stroke?"

Pam: So it's the characters from Golden Girls plus some other ones?

Sarah: I think there's boyfriends?

Joe: And like a cat or something probably?

Sarah: We haven't played it yet. It's one of those games you need multiple people to play, and no one ever wants to play it.

Pam: It definitely was always a fun board game to play, Clue. One of my favorites.

Joe: But I'm assuming there's no connection between feelings you have for the board game and feelings you have for the movie? Or is there?

Sarah: I'm a big fan of murder mystery in general. I have—you know those murder mystery dinner party kits? I have eight of them. We've done six of them. I love them. "Murder" is my favorite episode of The Office. All of the things I watch on Netflix are, like, British murder mysteries. I'm just a huge fan of the genre. Clue the game, I honestly don't think I have a good enough attention span for it. And no one ever wants to play. I would love to play Clue all the time. It's like asking people to play Monopoly.

Pam: No, Monopoly is much worse.

Joe: Well, if you play by the rules...

Pam: I could definitely sit down and play Clue, but Monopoly?

Joe: I don't think I'm very good at the game. I haven't really figured out a strategy to play well. I guess maybe there's a connection there when I was trying to figure out the movie as I was watching it. I mean, it happened too fast for me to figure out. Have you watched it enough times that you see the actual clues throughout the movie?

Sarah: Well, some of it's just straight up wrong. In one of the explanations, he goes "I threw the key, but I didn't throw the key, I put it in my pocket!" But in the movie, you see him throw the key, and then you see the key hit the step and fall into a bush. So it's like, no, you did throw the key. Even in the explanation... it's more that I like it for the humor? You have to ignore a whole lot. And then in the one explanation, at the end, where it's like, "I was really Mr. Body the whole time! That other guy was my butler!" They didn't act the way that they would have if that were true, so that's not a clue... it's just wrong. So they're just retconning stuff that we as the audience saw differently.

Joe: I guess watching it once would maybe be a better experience than watching it multiple time and see these wrong things? Or—

Sarah: It doesn't spoil the experience at all for me. But I don't treat as a murder mystery as much as I treat it as just a comedy that warms my heart.

Joe: It really is a classic farce. Seeing certain stage directions really reminded me of being in a comedy on the stage in the Masque. [Editor's note: The Masque was La Salle's theater program.]

Pam: Yeah, I definitely got that vibe too.

Joe: Certain things, I could almost hear the director saying, "well why don't you do this, maybe it'll be funny. Maybe one person in the audience will laugh."

Sarah: The funniest part of the movie, I think, of the movie is Madeline Kahn doing the "flames" thing. She made that up! She ad-libbed it. That wasn't even in there. I think it's hands down the funniest thing.

Pam: Wait, which part?

Sarah: She's talking about her hatred of Yvette, and she goes, "Flames! On the side of my face! Heaving!" It doesn't really make sense.

Joe: It's almost absurdist...



Pam: She was my favorite. Mrs. White, right?

Joe: I feel like everybody was good in that. Michael McKean is always good.

Pam: Obviously Tim Curry.

Joe: Apparently Carrie Fisher was supposed to play Scarlet?

Sarah: Yeah.

Joe: But she was too busy doing coke! Had to go to rehab. That's something I learned today, doing some research. Does anyone else have any favorite Clue trivia that they would like to share with the group...?

Sarah: Tim Curry was third choice. Their first choice was some guy, I don't remember. Their second choice was Rowan Atkinson.

Joe: Mr. Bean?

Sarah: Well, Mr. Bean wasn't "Mr. Bean" yet. So he was shot down because they were afraid that people wouldn't know who he was. Tim Curry had already done Rocky Horror at this point. But they were like "No one knows who Rowan Atkinson is!" I guess they were assuming, like, Martin Mull was drawing all the crowds?! I'm not sure how big everyone was. I know Christopher Lloyd was. Miss Scarlet, I think her name is Lesley Ann Warren, she's the one I keep forgetting what her name in real life even is. No one is "box office draws" there.

Pam: [to Joe] You just did Back to the Future. When was that made?

Joe: Same year. I don't know what was released first. Back to the Future was summer. I don't know if this was fall or spring...?

Sarah: This was December.

Joe: December, okay.

Sarah: I remember... because I was also a December release.

Joe and Pam: [laughter]

Joe: Well there you go.

Pam: So Christopher Lloyd was big. Although... didn't Kev say that—was it popular? Or not?

Joe: I mean, he described it as a "cult movie," which is... not true for Back to the Future.

Pam: Definitely not as much as Clue. Or like, Rocky Horror.

Joe: Do you believe that it's a cult movie? I guess I was trying to think today what actually defines a "cult movie." Do you have any idea?

Sarah: I don't know. I think part of it is... I have a history of liking movies that a lot of other people don't like. But then when you have a movie like Clue where you have other people that do like it—Mystery Men is another one. Like, that did horrible at the box office. We just had a Mystery Men night where everyone watched Mystery Men. "Cult" is, ya know, you don't have lunch boxes and backpacks. They're not making T-shirts of it at Hot Topic, for the most part. But you do have people who are like, "Yeah, I can quote that for you."

Joe: Uncomfortable being part of the crowd.

Pam: It's like a community following. Like you have your own little community.

Joe: It does feel good to make a connection to people that you wouldn't normally from some "stupid little movie."

Sarah: But even with [something like Mystery Men], I saw it in theaters. And my best friend Abby—Abby and I lived together for multiple years. We've been best friends for fourteen years. She had never seen it! But then other friends of our friend group were quoting the whole movie with me. It was split down the middle between "people that have seen it more than five times" and "people who have never seen it." Clue is also one of those. My sister and I have probably seen that movie maybe fifteen times just together. We were a household where we would have a movie and just be on a kick of it. Run it over and over. It would end, and we would start it from the beginning.

Joe: Do you remember the first time you saw it?

Sarah: I was either six or seven. I think that's part of why it's been a favorite. I remember liking it before I even understood half the jokes.

Pam: There are some jokes that would land for a six-year-old.

Sarah: You get the tone of it. It's very silly.

Joe: Yeah, it's one of those rare comedies that... I mean, it doesn't have any cursing, it doesn't have any nudity.

Sarah: All the humor is "nice," even though it's about murdering a bunch of people.

Joe: There's no blood, no gore. There's... implied dirty humor? But not outright stated. Probably the dirtiest part was Professor Plum grabbing Miss Scarlett's ass.

Sarah: That's that character establishment.

Joe: Yeah, I guess so. Ya know... I feel like I come across a moment like this in every movie that I've been watching so far [for this project], where I'm like, "I feel like that doesn't hold up." I dunno. Maybe I'm too sensitive about that kind of stuff. Do you think... is there any movie that holds up completely? Or is every movie going to have this moment where, like, it doesn't seem as funny as it may have in '85?

Sarah: I don't even know if it was supposed to be funny. I think it was just supposed to be, okay, we're establishing that this guy is a sleazeball. At least the women were fighting back.

Joe: That's true!

Sarah: He tries to grab them several times throughout the movie. And they're like, "Yeah, no, get off of me." I think it was in there mostly for like, we're establishing that this guy is a scumbag. I don't think we're supposed to like it or find it funny.

Joe: I'm appreciative of that answer.

Pam: Yeah, I don't think it was a "funny" moment. I think... that wasn't the tone necessarily. I mean, some people might giggle.

Joe: It wasn't, like, "this is a dark sexual harassment scene."

Pam: There's nothing like that in the movie. It's a light movie.

Sarah: If anything, we've got a woman running a women's brothel of sorts. It's kind of empowering!

Joe: So your answer to my question is: "Yes, there are movies that hold up completely. And Clue is one of them." [laughter]

Sarah: I mean, in that regard too. 1985 was a terrible year for fashion and a terrible year for design. The fact that this movie was supposed to be set in the '50s makes it still okay to look at. And you're like, "That's a nice dress, Miss Scarlet!" [laughter] It doesn't have giant poofballs. You don't have a side-pony.

Joe: It was definitely a good choice, setting it in that time period. And there was some bits from that period, where they were like, ya know, Communism red herrings and "Gasp! Socialism!"

Pam: They said that like ten times at the end, "Communism was a red herring."

Joe: It's a great bit! A lot of... I felt like there were so many groan-inducing jokes, and they all piled up for me. I was appreciative of how fast they piled up.

Pam: Has it ever been a play? Clue? Because it felt like I was watching a play.

Joe: It did feel that way.

Pam: I think if I was seeing it in a theater, I would've laughed more. I expect that humor from a play.

Sarah: I don't know if that story has been a play.  Senior year of high school, me and most of my current friend group, at Roman, we did a play called I Don't Have a Clue. We made our own Clue board for the director and everything.

Joe: That's great!

Sarah: But I don't know if this has actually been adapted.

Joe: So, a couple points. One, I did read a couple times today, there was an eighth grade class in the midwest that wrote to the producer and was like "Can we put this on?" And they did it, and sent him a home movie of it. There were a couple of other [groups] that did it. For free, because... as opposed to getting the rights from Paramount.

Pam: That's cool, because I definitely feel like it's a high school—like, I could see doing it in high school, thinking it was the funniest thing ever.

Joe: And also, the screenwriter was mainly a playwright at that point. Jonathan Lynn. Who ended up being the director too. So, John Landis, the dude from Blues Brothers and Animal House, he was originally going to direct it. But after he asked Jonathan Lynn to write the script, he got tied up with something else, so he asked Lynn to direct it too.

Pam: Why was John Landis' name in the credits then? Did he produce it?

Joe: Well he was the one that came up with the idea of, like, "Somebody should write a movie about Clue. I have this basic premise, but I just need"—his quote, not mine—"I just need a real screenwriter to write this." After they cycled through a few potential screenwriters [Editor's note: including Anthony Perkins, weirdly enough, because we just fucking talked about him], they landed on Jonathan Lynn. Who was a British playwright at the time.

Pam: That makes sense.

Joe: So yes, I agree with you—I think we can all agree—it seems like a play. It all happens in one house the whole movie. It's a "bottle movie," I guess you could call it. All cool things. Definitely makes it a unique movie. I guess another unique part of the movie that I appreciated was that there was different endings. I don't if anyone has a favorite ending...

Sarah: I think you have to watch all three, all taken together. I can imagine how much it would've sucked if you just got one. It's not complete. And then, if you, and your aunt, and your mom all went to different theaters and talked about it afterwards, and you were like, "wait, that's not what happened at all!" I think you have to watch all three. And I think all three... they're all flawed.

Joe: Like, logically?

Sarah: Yes! Logically!

Joe: I was curious watching it this time, hearing the explanations that Wadsworth was giving, like "Did that shit actually happen?" So I guess not. Or some of it did, some of it didn't?

Sarah: Yeah, some of it did, some of it didn't. But also, I think it's a cop-out to say, "Oh, just this person did it," or, "Oh, just this person did it." Some of his explanation, the one where everyone had a hand in it. That couldn't have happened that way.

Joe: It might be true to the spirit of the game, in that every time you play it, someone different did it.

Sarah: I think Murder on the Orient Express is done like that too.

Joe: Different endings?

Sarah: If you read the book. I watched—I don't know how you pronounce his name, David Suchet or something?—he does the role of Hercule Poirot. The film rendition of the book has a different ending, so you're not sitting there like, "I already know how this ends." I don't know if the most recent one that came out is the same way. But, yeah, they legit changed the ending of it. Because, well, if you already know how it ends, why would you want to watch this?

Joe: I have never seen that movie. [Editor's note: Okay, but we're gonna briefly clear it up, only so that Drew doesn't have a stroke. David Suchet played the lead role, not in the movies, but in an Agatha Christie British crime drama series, which had an Orient Express-based episode. And as far as the endings go, according to this article, all the endings are basically the same, but there are some major differences in the 2017 version of the movie with the ending, more character decisions than the actual mystery's solution being different. As for differences between the 1974 version and the book, I couldn't determine from a cursory Google search, and I'm not going to dig THAT deeply into it, because I don't want to ruin the ending, ya feel me?]

Pam: Me neither.

Joe: No one said it was their favorite.

Pam: Not yet!

Joe: But yeah, you were definitely right about the frustration one might have felt only getting one of those endings. Or, that very small slice of people who went to the theater again to see a second ending, because they had heard about that, and then seeing the same ending again.

Sarah: I was wondering about that too. What would they have to do? Call up the theaters and be like, "Excuse me, do you have Reel A, B, or C?"

Joe: Apparently the original plan was that movie listings in the newspaper were supposed to mark them A, B, and C. And they fucked it up.

Sarah: I don't know if it would've made it to [being] my favorite movie without the end. Because it kind of just spirals from being "chuckle humor" to "noises escape my mouth" kind of funny, when he's running around. I don't think it gets actual "I'm laughing"-funny until that point.

Joe: And that's the whole back third of the movie! Just Tim Curry running around, yelling.

Pam: And they're all following him around as a group.

Joe: Which is great. I can't imagine being Tim Curry and having to memorize that whole back third of the script. I can't imagine being any of the other actors, being like, "We're going to spend the next month just watching Tim Curry do this shit."

Sarah: That's what I was wondering too. If it was hard for them to—because some of the dialogue overlaps [between endings]—if it was harder for them to remember which one they were blocking out. Starting to say wrong lines because they're thinking of the other ending.

Joe: They're professionals, I guess. Apparently, the billiard room in the house was real, so during breaks they would play pool... I know a lot of this trivia from the Buzzfeed article that I read this morning. [laughter] And of course Buzzfeed made it seem like, ya know, "There were SHENANIGANS on the set of Clue! It was just as crazy off-screen as it was on-screen!" And then it was like... oh yeah, they made sure the pool table worked so they could play pool. Wow! Fucking crazy!

Pam: It was actually filmed in a huge mansion?

Joe: A set, but it was...

Sarah: I think it was both.

Joe: I guess they didn't rent out a mansion, but it was a mansion on a movie set.

Sarah: It was a mansion, for parts of it. I think it was the hall? But other parts were built. I remember—it wasn't that long ago—the mansion that some of it was filmed at burned down. [Editor's note: Okay, according to wikipedia, all scenes were shot on a movie lot dressed up to look like a mansion, except for the ballroom scenes, and the exterior driveway scenes. Indeed, the mansion where these scenes were filmed burned down in 2005.]

Pam: In California, I'm assuming?

Joe: That's where everything burns down!

Pam: ...Well it's also where they film movies?

Joe: Okay, so. I guess we talked about the nitty-gritty of it. What's you main thesis as far as: Why is this your favorite movie? Does it have to do with the movie itself, the feelings you feel about it, the memories you have of it? All three?

Sarah: I think it's probably all three. My parents never put any parameters... we basically didn't have rules. So we were allowed to rent whatever we wanted. There was this little corner video store in someone's basement at Castor and Pratt called "Family Video," but it was just a dude's basement. And you'd go down there, it was this small basement's worth of movies. We were allowed to pick whatever we wanted. I remember picking Clue enough times that I was told I can't pick Clue anymore. I just remember being a little kid, being like, "I like this." I remember being six- or seven-years-old, watching it, and enjoying it, and then getting older, and not being allowed to rent it from Blockbuster, because, like, "I'm not spending three dollars to rent a movie that you've seen before." So when I finally got I-can-buy-my-own-DVDs money, it was one of the first five DVDs that I bought. And then it would just be on. Like, I'm doing homework, AP Bio till three o'clock in the morning, what do I put on in the background? Just put that on, and when it's over, just hit play again. It's just in the background of all the... cleaning the house and doing homework, it's kind of my go-to. It's very chill, it's got a lot of people that I like in the movie. Unfortunately, some we've lost, some we're going to lose soon. That movie is still going to be there, though, even when they're all gone.

Joe: You feel like you've grown with Clue.

Sarah: Yeah.

Joe: Did you, when you were six or seven, I guess that was before it became a cult classic? Or was it right on the cusp of that?

Sarah: I have no idea. None of my other friends were watching it, of course. [laughter]

Joe: Were you the reason?! Were you the sole fan at six? And then everyone took after Sarah K********?!

Sarah: I'm sure grown-ups liked it! I honestly don't even know how my own parents feel about the film. But I know I rented it because I used to play the board game with my mom... in whatever way a six- or seven-year-old can.

Joe: Cheating a lot?

Sarah: Pretending to play Clue?

Joe: So it was like, you didn't have a dollhouse. You had a Clue board.

Sarah: More importantly, I didn't have cable.

Joe: [laughter]

Sarah: I was very limited with what shows I had. Arthur, Sesame Street, other random PBS shows, and whatever movies I could rent. And then, whatever my parents put on. Interestingly enough, one of my other favorite movies kind of ruined my childhood. I saw Total Recall at way too young of an age.

Joe: I've never seen that one either.

Sarah: It's really good if you like bad '80s sci-fi. Or '80s future sci-fi.

Joe: Who's in that one?

Sarah: Schwarzenegger is the lead. But there's this one scene where this thing comes out of the guy's belly and starts talking to him. And I couldn't look at my own stomach for like four years.

Joe and Pam: [laughter]

Sarah: I would take a bath and just avoid looking at my stomach because I was afraid that Kuato was going to come out. But no, that was what we did for fun—

Joe: You weren't afraid that you were going to get shot or hanged after watching Clue?

Sarah: No. My fears were dolls, Kuato, and the bunny from Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey. I still won't watch that movie.

Joe: You've never been a singing telegrammer?

Sarah: No. Did you know that girl is from the Go-Gos?

Joe: Really?

Sarah: Yeah, she was the guitarist or bassist or something. [Editor's note: Jane Wiedlin is the guitarist.]

Joe: No shit. So that was just, like, she wanted to be in it? Or someone [on staff] liked the Go-Gos or something?

Sarah: I don't know.

Joe: I mean, it's such a bit part, but it's so funny. That's probably my favorite bit of the whole movie. Like, in the middle of all this craziness, someone singing, and then immediately getting shot.

Sarah: And that's why I think the one ending where they're like, "Hey, everyone killed these people for different reasons." Only one person had a reason to kill her. In the explanations where it's like "One person did it all!" No! They have no reason to kill her. They'd just shut the door in her face.

Joe: It's great, it's too funny, man. There's a lot of funny moments in this movie. Um... damn. I think I talked about everything I wanted to talk about. What do you want to talk about? Anything?

Sarah: I guess one of the things that I think about a lot is, if they remade it—and I heard that there's rumors that they are—

Joe: Ryan Reynolds is attached to a potential remake.

Sarah: The problem that I have with movies being remade now is when you're just trying to fill the shoes of something that already exists. It's something that I think about when I'm washing the dishes, like, if I were to recast Clue, who would I cast in it? But I think the problem is, if you remake Clue and you don't do it like how Jumanji did it, with a total reimagining of everything, you're doing a disservice to the one that's already out there.

Joe: And I can't imagine that... how could you possibly reimagine Clue? It's already an insanely basic premise to begin with.

Sarah: I just mean more like, being like, "Okay, whoever is Yvette has to be a busty maid character. We need a sleazy professor. We need a Senator's wife." All of those characters were made up for the [movie]. There's already characters from the different games. They just made up all that stuff. I would hate to see that movie happen, and they're like, we're just ripping off what they did.

Joe: Okay, so you're in charge of Clue the reboot. What does it look like in your mind?

Sarah: I think it's still the basic premise of, you have all these people in a house. But I think you would have to come up with a different idea. There's nothing about being blackmailed in the original game. So, you're not tied to that. The only thing you're tied to is characters with color-based names and the weapons and the rooms. I think that that stuff is the anchor, that stuff should be there. But everything else, I would hope somebody would come up with a whole new story. Like, Mr. Body's the dude who dies, but to be like, "Who's our Wadsworth, who's our Ms. Scarlet?" I think that's such a waste of... Plenty of people have ideas out there. To just redo something that was already done, exactly the way it was done, is silly.

Joe: I might see it as, maybe a group of people are having a "Clue Party," and they're watching the original Clue movie, and they're trying to recreate it, and hijinks ensue... I'm stealing that idea from Human Centipede 2.

Pam: You also talked about that in your [interview] with Kev.

Joe: [pause] I'm going to try to drop as many Human Centipede references as I can in these interviews.

Pam: Are you hoping someone says that's their favorite movie?

Joe: Sure! ...Oh yeah, and I'm gonna try this bit. [reading from notes] "That's how the interview could've ended. But how about this?" Now we can continue our interview.

Sarah and Pam: ...

Joe: Because, you see, this interview is going to have three endings.

Sarah: Okay.


Joe: The first one is going to be the Human Centipede ending. I dunno, what's the second ending?

Pam: I don't know! I thought you wrote this all down?

Joe: Okay! How about... um... Sarah, make your case to the skeptic about why she's wrong about not appreciating Clue. In terms of... okay, so you talked about why this is a good movie to you personally. But why should other people besides you appreciate this movie?

Sarah: I don't think I can do that.

Pam: [laughter]

Joe: That's fair.

Sarah: My favorite movies are this, Mystery Men, Super Nintendo Bros., the live-action film, the greatest movie of 1993—

Joe: Super Mario Bros.?

Sarah: ...yes.

Joe: [laughter] That seems... if you like Clue, you like Super Mario Bros.

Sarah: I like The Island of Dr. Moreau with Marlon Brando. I like... very bad movies.

Pam: No, I think hearing you talk about it, and talking about how it has a cult following, definitely makes me appreciate it more.

Joe: It's definitely one of those movies that, like, you either like it or you don't. The humor is derived from the fact that it's just a classic farce, and some people just don't like that shit. If you do, you do, if you don't, you don't. I don't know if you can necessarily convince somebody that slapstick humor is funny.

Sarah: I think you have to admit that, even though it's based on a board game, it's very loose, and it's a good idea. It's very original. I think that a lot of people... like, how Mad Max did really well, but Mad Max did really well because it had a good story, and it had good costumes, it had good music. It was all of those pieces working together. I think that Clue has all of those things enough to be timeless. The set, the costumes... I don't know if you noticed, but their cars matched their color, even though their outfits didn't.

Joe: Ahhh. Okay!

Sarah: Just little things like that. The guy who did the music is the guy who did the music for almost all of the Mel Brooks films. So, even listening to that... I rewatched it Thursday, because I was like, "Let me make sure I know what I'm talking about." Usually it is on in the background. And I was thinking about how much that the music really gives me that nostalgic feeling too.

Pam: There was definitely a lot of Mel Brooks feelings that I got.

Joe: "Brooks-isms"?

Pam: Yeah, like, "This feels like I'm watching a Mel Brooks movie."

Joe: Which is a mark in its favor?

Pam: It's definitely a type of movie. I won't say it's my favorite type, and probably that's why I didn't love it that much. But... it's a type. But I also get the point of you "growing up" with it too. I like the movie Beetlejuice for the same reasons. If I watched Beetlejuice for the first time now, I would be like "This is so fucking dumb." I get it.

Joe: And these interviews don't necessarily have to be a "defense" of the movie. I'm not interested in why other people don't like it, I'm interested in why you do like it. I think you've adequately done so. [reading from the notes again] "But here's how the interview really ends!"


Joe: Who do you think done it, and why?

Pam: [laughter] ...What?

Joe: Who do you think done it?!

Pam: Like, pick out of those three?

Joe: I don't know. Answer the question as you see fit.

Sarah: I think... I guess... [pause]

Joe: [laughter]

Sarah: Like you were saying before, if you're watching the movie, you have to watch all three endings. Three different explanations. But I think personally the one I like best is the one where the people with actual motives to kill those certain people are the ones that "done it." ...I don't want to spoil things for someone reading this who hasn't seen it.

Joe: I'll put a big "spoiler alert" at the top.

Sarah: But, the ending where Mrs. Peacock kills everybody, and the ending where Miss Scarlet kills everybody, like, why would they do that? Miss Peacock only had motive to kill one person. Miss Scarlet only had motive to kill one person... two people.

Pam: It made the most sense, the other one.

Sarah: The one where it's like, "This person killed this person because..." and "This person killed this person because..." And it also explained why those extra people were killed. Without the proper explanations, there's no reason for the motorist to die. There's no reason for the police officer to die. There's no reason for the cook, or the telegram girl to die. But then when they explain motive, it's like, "Oh, okay."

Joe: So you're more comfortable watching a film where there's more murderers versus less.

Sarah: Well, yeah.

Joe: That's the fourth interview ending that was never shot completely.

Pam: What?

Joe: There was a fourth ending that they didn't shoot [for the movie]. So this is the fourth ending of the interview, where... [pause] It was a joke, where we talk about how you were comfortable with murder.

Pam: I mean, if you play the board game, then you can say the same thing. "You're comfortable with murder."

Joe: No, I mean... that was the joke! I was trying to end the interview with a bit.

Pam: Oh.

Joe: I failed.

Pam: I think this is why you didn't make the improv team.

Tuesday, July 23, 2019

Your Favorite Movie: The Big Lebowski, with Nate A.


Welcome back to another installment of Your Favorite Movie. It's time to sit back, relax, and read a conversation with a friend (i.e. fuck podcasts), all about his or her favorite movie.

Typically, I would introduce the friend with some sardonic quip like "This poor sucker got bamboozled into providing me with blog content," but I spoke this week with Nate A****, the only other sucker I know who still writes for his own blog. I met Nate in his scroungy dorm room down the hall in 2007, in a drunken preparation for a Hold Steady concert. This was after I had Facebooked him about burning me some music after I saw his record collection via iTunes Home Sharing (I know it was twelve years ago, but shit, looking back on the idea of Facebooking a stranger still makes me cringe). Anyways, far removed from being some random drunk freshman in a senior's dorm, we have become actual friends in recent years, due to geography, drinking, similarly-aged babies, and... yeah, the fact that we both write about music on blogs in 2019.

It surprised me a little bit that Nate chose as his favorite movie The Big Lebowski, because, having only a cursory understanding of the movie, I didn't think there was much to discuss. But the movie is fatter and older than I realized, and Nate did a good job of fleshing it out below (with his permission, lightly edited, etc., etc., you know the deal). We sat in a bar backyard in Fishtown, drinking beers in preparation for another concert... because maybe we're really not that far removed from that 2007 Hold Steady concert after all.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Nate: Do people mention how hard it is to pick a favorite movie?

Joe: Yeah. A lot of the people that didn't respond to the Facebook thing, when I ask them, like, "Oh, you didn't tell me your favorite movie," they say, "because I didn't fucking know!"

Nate: Yeah, before you ask me any questions, I'm going to caveat with this: I think trying to commit to a favorite of anything is hard. I think all you can do is say, this is a list of, like, these are the seven things. And go from there. There's no bad answer there. So I'll say that this is certainly one of my favorite movies. And if you catch me on the right day, it's my absolute favorite movie. But it's a hard question.

Joe: Do you feel like you picked it because it was just the easiest to talk about out of the seven that you liked?

Nate: So there was three movies that came to mind. The first one was this one. The second was No Country for Old Men. And the third one was 12 Angry Men. 12 Angry Men, are you familiar with that film?

Joe: No.

Nate: It was from, I believe, the '50s. It's a courtroom drama, this jury is trying convince—

Joe: Oh yeah! Okay, sure.

Nate: Love that movie. Black-and-white. It's been remade a bunch. Uh... that's really more of a play. That's also just, like, twelve dudes talking. It's about the power of how good it is to talk? And I'm like, I like this movie a lot, but I would hesitate to call it my very favorite. And No Country for Old Men, I really love it, but it's also recency bias a little bit? It just came out twelve years ago, so it hasn't been out long enough for it to truly gestate, and to compare to the classics. But that was the other one I thought about.

Joe: So anyone who picks those two movies is going to have to answer to Nate A****.

Nate: Just know that anyone who picks any movie is going to have to answer to Nate A****. But certainly for those two.

Joe: [laughter] In deference to the blog series "Meagan and Nate Go to the Movies"

Nate: [laughter]

Joe: ...what does your wife think of The Big Lebowski?

Nate: She hasn't seen it yet.

Joe: If you had to guess what she would think of it.

Nate: I think she would... I think she would find it funny, and like it, but it would take a while to get to it. And that's not necessarily for reasons that are born in the movie, but reasons that are born in my own family. There is this very big legacy of the film in my family. We watch it on Christmas Eve. It's our It's a Wonderful Life. My father will throw it on at any hour of the day, at any occasion. If there's a block of time where we're just sitting around for 45 minutes, he might just throw it on. We will reference the film a lot in conversation. It's one of those things where everyone in my immediate family, even my mother, has come to appreciate it enough, and fold it into our personal, familial lexicon, that it's become... annoying? So for Meagan to be an in-law into that, she has a... I wouldn't say hesitance, but I think there would be a lot of: "This is a fucking A**** movie." To get over, to like it. I think she would ultimately like it a lot.

Joe: It's very interesting that this is the fifth movie I've discussed with somebody, and it's third time that somebody said this is a movie that they would watch during the holidays with family. Does that mean that our favorite movies are that much connected to how much we care about family?

Nate: I have a much simpler explanation. The holidays are, by and large, the time when families get together. And they are, by and large—at least in my family—what other opportunity is [there] where we're all sitting around in the same place? Right? Maybe we don't have a lot to talk about, or a lot of things going on in our lives, what is a way we can have some commonality? What about this movie we've all seen before that we all like? It could be just as simple as that. It could be as deep as, yes, these movies are the "stories we tell each other," that are ingrained in our being. But it might just be that everyone's together for limited amounts of time, watching something low key. No one has to focus too much. You can move in and out of it. It's an easy, passive thing to do.

Joe: I guess it's interesting that The Big Lebowski is that movie for you, because it is a very passive movie.

Nate: And this is what I like about it. You can just be alone with that movie, and turn your head, and check out what's happening. And you can be sitting into it, staring at the screen the whole time, looking for connections. I think it's a very satisfying movie in either regard. It works on two completely different, distinct levels. Which is part of why I have a fraught relationship with it now. Later in my life. But we can talk about that later.

Joe: Okay!

Nate: Please, I don't want to preempt your questions here.

Joe: No, not at all. So... let me quote Fatter Older. "I love The Big Lebowski as much as, and probably more than, this guy, but I realize getting a Lebowski-themed tattoo is to send a certain message to the world. I'm not prepared to send that message." This is referring to you seeing a Lebowski-themed tattoo.

Nate: This was on my list of the worst tattoos, was it not?

Joe: Yes.

Nate: So... classic Fatter Older blog post!

Joe: I feel like this is the point where you are sending a message to the world. By staking this as your favorite movie. So what is the message that you are sending?

Nate: But here's the thing. I've already outed myself by saying there's a list of seven other movies. So clearly I've revealed myself to be a multifaceted person.

Joe: But this is the one you chose, so there is a message.

Nate: I think the message would be: It's time for people to reclaim this movie. This movie has been, for lack of a better word, co-opted by dorks.

Joe: [laughter]

Nate: And I need to be clear on this. This movie now lives in a space that is adjacent to Rocky Horror Picture Show, or adjacent to The Room, in that there is a culture around this movie that celebrates this movie to fetishistic degree. Right? There are festivals that happen called Lewbowski Fest, where people go to these festivals, dressed as their favorite characters, and they will say their favorite lines to each other, as if they are in the film. And I find that shit so lame and abhorrent.

Joe: Like, cringe-worthy.

Nate: Yes, deeply cringe-worthy. And that's the disconnect I feel. On a level—and this is what I'm talking about with the "fraught relationship"—people love this movie. And I think this movie's genius is that it can say everything or nothing about culture, if you want it to. It is an empty vessel, and it is a full painting, in that you can glean a lot of meaning from it, or you can laugh at the jokes. And I feel like too many people have connected to the surface-level pieces of it. Not enough with the sort of metatextual, larger, philosophical conversation going on beneath the movie.

Joe: There was a lot of connections to The Big Lebowski in the Collegian section, CAKE. [Editor's note: This was the satire section of La Salle's newspaper. Nate, while a student, was the Entertainment section editor.]

Nate: [laughter] When you were running it?

Joe: No! I was Kicks.

Nate: You never made the leap over to CAKE?

Joe: We switched for one week [only, as a lark], and I just wrote a big long essay about The Big Lebowski, because I thought that was the biggest connection I could make with CAKE.

Nate: This was after my time, correct?

Joe: Yeah, when we switched, but the guys that were doing it, I think did it all four years?

Nate: The guys I thought did it... anyways, were getting deep down the road here.

Joe: Sure.

Nate: I just know that—I'm saying this, now that we're talking about CAKE, I'm glad this will be on the record—CAKE in the Collegian was historically a place for, like, real comedy snob-level comedy. A truly off-kilter, left-beat sort of thing. Historical, when I came to the newspaper. And that was because the people at the helm were deeply funny people. Creative. They've gone on to do funny things. And as time goes on, less and less funny people took over that section of the paper, and I'm not surprised to hear it devolved into Big Lebowski jokes. The Big Lebowski jokes are the sort of jokes you make when you want to appear to be funny, but you're not. Which is, again, part of the fraught relationship I have with this movie. [Editor's note: If any previous CAKE editor is reading this, I'd love to hear your response to this when you are discussing with me your own favorite movie... though, hopefully, your favorite movie isn't The Big Lebowski.]

Joe: What do you feel is the point of this movie?

Nate: So, just to be clear, what is the movie saying?

Joe: Sure. If there is one.

Nate: I think the movie simultaneously has a deeply cynical, but a deeply—"compassion" is the wrong word—but it has a very cynical view of how people feel about themselves, how they position themselves in the world and treat themselves. It also has a cynical view against the opposite. Against the counterculture. But it's very compassionate about it as well.

Joe: About both?

Nate: About both. I think the point the movie is trying to make is that we're all stuck, we're all ridiculous. And there may not be a better way to live, any other way. So the best we can do is do as little harm as possible. But... again, you have to dig pretty far for a movie that has a joke about a guy smoking a roach, and then it falls on his dick, and he crashes his car.

Joe: [laughter]

Nate: So you have to dig for it a little bit. But I sort of think the key to it is, in one of the last scenes of the movie, they're shaking out the ashes of their dead friend. And the ashes blow all into—

Joe: Which is a great bit.

Nate: It's fucking hysterical. But it's also very bleak and very sad, but it's also very poignant, and ultimately I think that's what this movie is getting at. Life is a bleak, sad affair, but it's hilarious, so the best you can do is try to do right by other people. I think that's what it's ultimately trying to say.

Joe: Do you feel like the Dude kind of emulates that idea, that you shouldn't take things too seriously? I mean... I guess they literally spell that out.

Nate: The opening monologue is entirely about that. [laughter]

Joe: True. I guess I found it interesting during those moments where a character was—a secondary character was "very serious." For example, "The Big" Lebowski, the second or third scene with him where he's staring into the fire, and says something like, "What makes a man?" and the Dude is like... "Do you mind if I smoke a bowl in here, man?" I feel like the first line is "this is a typical movie," and the second line is [a character] knowing—maybe not breaking the fourth wall, but knowing somewhat inherently that this is ridiculous, everything that's happening. Commenting on the fact that this movie is, in itself, ridiculous.

Nate: That's kind of what makes it work, that the Dude himself is so ridiculous a character, so as to be a mirror for the ridiculous things that are happening around him. "The Big" Lebowski is looking into a fire because his trophy wife is missing, shrouded in robes in a dark room, and [the Dude] wants to smoke a jay. It's a reflection on how dramatic and silly this all is. And that's the deeper level. There's also the mid-level subterfuge of: there is no larger mystery here. Just somebody ran off. That's all it is. There's no kidnapping. There's no heist. And that's another part of it. In life, there is no heist. In life, there is no plot. There's just a series of things that happen, and sometimes they look like they connect, but more often than not, they don't.

Joe: So you're saying this is a very realistic movie.

Nate: If you wanna get deep into it, I think it's a very cogent reflection of how I see life truly unfolding. It's hard to say it's "realistic"...because of the acid flashbacks... And this is my point. This movie is something that I like a lot—it's basically a crime novel. It's a crime story. The Dude is the archetype of a bungling private eye. Now, granted, the stakes are much lower, but it has all the hallmarks. He's hired, he meets Person A, Person A leads to Twist B, Twist B to Spot C, and by that point, there are so many characters and place it could be going, you don't know what to think. You don't know who's important, who's not important. There are dream sequences, where you wonder, is this real? Is this not real? It's got a lot of tastes of mystery writing and noir film writing, while also being sort of a weird stoner comedy. I just all that very compelling from a formulaic level... but it's also really funny when the guy says, "Nice marmot," throws a fucking weasel in the bathtub, and says "I'm gonna cut off your johnson!" That stuff just works! It just works.

Joe: I guess I did see that the Coen Brothers based this on a mystery novelist—

Nate: Raymond Chandler, yeah.

Joe: —and apparently his stories would be interesting, like this, and then ultimately go nowhere.

Nate: So that was like—not to paint with too broad a brush, not to make this movie blog a literature blog—

Joe: We have Book Club tomorrow, so...

Nate: [laughter] That's true. So—a big piece of genre crime fiction from the '50s and '60s in American West is: there's a down-on-his-luck P.I. who gets hired by a dame, and by being hired by a dame, eventually goes down a dark alley and gets blackjacked, and has a dream sequence, and he gets to a place where he's not sure what's real and what's not real, and he just gets sucked into this world where every character could be connected, but ultimately... the answer was staring you in the face the entire time, but you got caught looking at the pinstripes to a certain degree. There was just so much happening that anything seemed possible. And at the end of it, the thing that was most possible was the thing that actually happened. The art is in making you, the reader—or the watcher—start to also ignore what, in your head, you know is the right answer, to hang out with these weird characters.

Joe: There were a lot of weird characters.

Nate: Who did you think the weirdest character was? I know this [supposed to be] you asking me questions, but I'm wondering who you thought was a weird character.

Joe: I guess the Germans?

Nate: The nihilists?

Joe: The nihilists. Including, Flea?

Nate: [laughter] That's right.

Joe: And Aimee Mann?

Nate: Aimee Mann was the girlfriend of Flea. And Peter Stormare, a great character actor, was one of the nihilists.

Joe: There was a lot—

Nate: Before you get into this question, I want to talk about my favorite character as time has gone on. The guy who was hanging out in Maude's apartment? Just cackling at the Dude?

Joe: I feel like there's a lot of characters like that, who were just—not connected to the main plot, but who were—and not even commenting on the plot, just like, hanging on the fringes, being their own asshole-ish selves.

Nate: So if you wanna be a fart-sniffer, you can be like, "That's what life is like," right? But I think the answer is, that dude is just fucking funny. Cackles at Lebowski, is just like, "Ahhh, it's Dennis about the Beinnale!" He has a weirdly affected accent, and the way he's just being a dick. He's just a funny guy. I assume someone was like, it would be funny to watch the Dude play off of this weird art prick for a few minutes. Or it would be funny to watch the Dude and Walter talk to a guy in an iron lung while they threaten the kid about his homework. That stuff, I think, would just be funny.

Joe: Was there any character in this movie who wasn't a dick?

Nate: Yes, and he dies.

Joe: Donny.

Nate: The only character who is not a dick is Donny. And that's correct, he's the only nice guy. And he's also, like—he's not capable, but he's the only guy who is remotely... it's funny because, those three guys are funny together because Walter is just talking to the Dude, the Dude is not taking anything Walter says seriously. Donny is keyed in on every word, and all Walter can tell him to do is shut the fuck up. And it's such this weird younger-brother-older-brother relationship. But it gets me every time. That whole jag about "Lenin said..." "I Am the Walrus," "I Am the Walrus," "That was V.I. Lenin!" I think about that every now and then, and it just makes me laugh. It's just fucking funny. I think a lot of this comes down to this is just a fucking funny movie. There's a lot of really strong, weird performances in it. Everyone seems very game to goof around, and it's very funny, and very fun to hang out in that world.

Joe: I guess that circles back around to you getting upset about people taking it a little more seriously than it deserves to be taken.

Nate: Yeah, sure.

Joe: I know you had mentioned the festivals, but we didn't mention that there is a religion based around the Dude. "Dudeism."

Nate: Oh boy, oh boy.

Joe: [laughter] It [reading from notes] advocates and encourages the practice of "going with the flow", "being cool headed", et cetera... "taking it easy."

Nate: I mean, this is what's fucked up. There are actual established religions where the goal is to do that. So when you say "I practice Dudeism," I just think, alright, number one, you're an idiot. You're just an idiot. And, I dunno, number two, you must really like pot or acid. I think you've done enough party drugs to the point where you think you've solved the problem, and the solution is something someone thought of ten thousand years ago... but what is your question? Sorry. [laughter]

Joe: [pause] Do you see any of yourself in the Dude?

Nate: [laughter]

Joe: That wasn't supposed to be the follow-up question.

Nate: No, sure.

Joe: It felt right.

Nate: I think the beauty of it is if you're doing it right, everyone should see a little bit of themselves in the Dude from time to time. Because the Dude is... I mean look at him. He's overmatched, he's slow. He's charming, but he's always a few steps behind what's going on. And when the going gets tough, he quits. Those are very relatable traits to me. On the surface level, we're nothing alike. I have a job, he doesn't. He smokes more pot than I do.

Joe: You have a family.

Nate: I think milk and alcohol are gross together.

Joe: [laughter]

Nate: There are definitely things I find appealing. There is a value in learning to just let things unfold. But the other side of that is, you become—you have to go see your landlord's interpretive dance performance, because you can't afford to pay the rent. There's a point where just going with the flow leads to doing nothing. And maybe that's the point? Maybe the point is that it's complete Zen to want nothing. Maybe that's the goal. But I don't see a great deal of similarities between myself and the Dude. I feel like I have more in common with Walter at this point in my life.

Joe: [laughter] The anger?

Nate: Flying off the handle for no reason. [laughter] About stupid shit. Pulling a gun on someone for stepping over the line.

Joe: Probably my favorite bit is when he smashed the car. Just the repeating [of the phrase].

Nate: What makes it the best is the deadpan on the kid's face. Yeah, and this is the fucking thing. I have a hard time totally rejecting the whole festival piece of it, because... it's a funny movie. There are a lot of good jokes in this movie. But I think that the people who are doing things like Dudeism and going to Lebowski Fest are just engaging with the parts of it that I find the least thematically interesting, although the most satisfying from a comedy perspective.

Joe: That's fair. I feel like it's always—people like that always latch on to movies that are quotable. Though there's not a religion based on Anchorman, I heard a lot of Anchorman quotes in my youth.

Nate: [laughter] That's the thing. Anchorman quotes, you heard a lot of... because I said them a lot in high school. You heard a lot of Wedding Crashers quotes in college. There is this whole "culture." I think that if this movie was more successful, it would absolutely be in that same quotable place as Anchorman. But, because it was only seen by, like, film dweebs and stoner dads, the film dweebs and stoner dads are the ones doing the festivals. I think if more people saw it, there wouldn't be festivals. It would just be quoted by frat dudes, and we could all just move on with our lives.

Joe: [laughter] Okay.

Nate: Yeah, let's get back on track here.

Joe: So. We're gonna rate some of the music—

Nate: Excellent.

Joe: —using the Nates System. [Editor's note: You can find an explanation for this HERE. Warning: the pretentiousness of naming a rating system after yourself is part of the joke!]

Nate: I love it.

Joe: We have to start with the Eagles. Neutral Nates?

Nate: Um, first of all, it's "Zero Nates." How dare you. I will give the Eagles Zero Nates, because I do find them abhorrent, but they are doing the thing they are meant to be doing.

Joe: I read through the IMDB Trivia typically, for these movies. There's not really many things to discuss—

Nate: There's not much trivia there?

Joe: There's a lot [for Big Lebowski], but nothing I could bounce off you besides, like, "Hey, did you know this?" But the one thing I did find interesting was that Glenn Frey of the Eagles took very much offense to the fact that the Dude hated the Eagles, and like, confronted Jeff Bridges at a party. Like, "Why didn't he like the Eagles?"

Nate: I think that is very telling as to why the Dude doesn't like the Eagles. Like, that kind of behavior there is your answer, Glenn!

Joe: That's fair.

Nate: And this is not for a movie blog, honestly, but the Eagles are funny for how... there's a documentary about the Eagles, have you ever seen it?

Joe: No.

Nate: They fucking hate each other, and they're miserable assholes. They are fucking pricks who made this weird, toothless soft rock. And it's just this weird, incongruous thing, for these guys to be haughty and huffy about, like, who came up for the riff for... I dunno, I can't even think of an Eagles song! Fucking "Hotel California." It's a good documentary to watch.

Joe: "Take It Easy."

Nate: If you wanna see a bunch of intense guys get mean about shitty music, it's a great documentary for that. Anyways, Zero Nates for the Eagles. The Eagles do what they mean to.

Joe: They make a lot of money off that shit.

Nate: Look, I begrudge no one. It's not for me. God bless them.

Joe: How the fuck—this has nothing to do with the movie.

Nate: Sure.

Joe: How is a greatest hits album the best selling album of all time?! [Editor's note: It depends on how you count streams. Pure sales, the child molester seems to have the Eagles beat. But with streams included, Their Greatest Hits (1971-1975), tops the list. YMMV.]

Nate: It's inexplicable, isn't it? What it tells me is that, it's the power of radio, man. You get five great radio songs, and that's all it takes. It's the same reason... why are we still hearing "Hotel California"? There's something about it, fifty years later, that resonates.

Joe: It's insane.

Nate: You hate it. You hate that a greatest hits album is the most successful one.

Joe: Right!

Nate: [laughter] I don't blame you.

Joe: If someone picked that for Record Club...

Nate: Isn't that supposed to be how it works, in theory? If you put all your best songs on the same record, shouldn't that be your best record?

Joe: I guess it was a time [during which] people had to spend money on music. But also had limited amounts of money to spend?

Nate: I think it's the same reason that nobody that I know has a single Queen record, but everybody I know has that two-disc Queen "Best of."

Joe: Fuck Queen, man.

Nate: [laughter] It's the same thing. Maybe the songs are so good, you don't need to engage with the rest of it. Maybe it's, like, you already so completely accomplished your goal, as to not have to go back to the albums? I dunno. Maybe folks just wanna listen to "Take It Easy."

Joe: Queen... Zero Nates?

Nate: I give Queen One Nate Up. Hate to say it.

Joe: I give it a Thousand Joes Down.

Nate: [laughter]

Joe: Um, okay. The Dude was a Metallica roadie.

Nate: The Speed of Sound tour?

Joe: Just, Metallica in general.

Nate: Oh, interesting. Metallica, I think, is a good example of a band that started in one place, dropped to some really bad lows, and, by just hanging around long enough, got themselves back up to some place close to respectability. I will begrudgingly give Metallica Zero Nates, though I feel they are an excellent candidate for One Nate Down, given how far afield they went in the '90s and the 2000s. And they put out what might be one of the worst pop-metal albums ever.

Joe: St. Anger.

Nate: There are some good tunes on St. Anger, but the lyrics are unbelievably bad. The production's very bad.

Joe: As someone who was on the crew team for one month, the only month after St. Anger came out, and had to hear that music while the crew team was on their ergometers—and also as someone who steals music constantly... I give Metallica a Thousand Joes Down.

Nate: Wait, I have a question for you. As a drummer, how did you feel about the drum sounds on St. Anger?

Joe: I feel like he's closer to Neil Peart, who is a robot that doesn't feel anything, than Meg White, who is not technically sound, but has more soul—

Nate: Right, like more feeling—

Joe: He's not Ringo. So fuck him.

Nate: He definitely sounds like he's playing a folding chair during certain parts of that album.

Joe: And he also sued his own fans. So he can go fuck himself.

Nate: Yeah, that's fucked up too. [Editor's note: Since this interview took place, it was reported that Metallica took part in some shady business practices involving ticket sales. If it seems like I am piling on Metallica, then they probably deserve it.]

Joe: Um... Red Hot Chili Peppers?

Nate: [sigh] This is the failing of the scale. I don't like the Red Hot Chili Peppers. But, there's no denying that they achieved their goal of being the horniest band around for a very long time.

Joe: [laughter] Do you feel like they are more horny or less horny because they covered their penises up with socks?

Nate: [laughter] That's a great question.

Joe: [laughter]

Nate: I don't think I've ever been asked that question before. I think that they are obviously less horny. If they were truly as they were purported to be, they would just have their penises out all the time.

Joe: As someone who often takes the sock off, I give them a Thousand Joes Down.

Nate: [laughter] I give them Zero Nates. I hate it, but I give them Zero Nates.

Joe: Aimee Mann. The toeless Aimee Mann.

Nate: I give Aimee Mann... I'm tempted to give her Two Nates Up. I will give her One Nate Up. It's only because I'm not fully aware of her catalog enough to give her the full Two Nates. But, she definitely seems to elevate anything she appears on. And, I think she's due for me to spend some time with her. Based on my limited knowledge of Aimee Man, I will give her One Nate Up, tentative Two Nates Up.

Joe: Okay. I actually agree with you, possibly for the same reasons. I liked Mental Illness a few years ago. I will not give her a Thousand Joes Down.

Nate: She was on a record with Ted Leo about five years ago.

Joe: I forgot about that! I never listened to that.

Nate: Great record.

Joe: Okay, earn your music blog credentials. Phoebe Bridgers. You know why [I'm asking]. You can make the connection.

Nate: Sure, I'll make the connection. For those of you who will be reading this later on down the road, there's a scene in The Big Lebowski in which Walter and the Dude go to West Hollywood to find... what the guy's name? The son of...

Joe: Larry Sellers.

Nate: They go to find Larry Sellers—

Joe: Only because I just watched it yesterday.

Nate: —the son of... David Sellers? Who's the father? What's his name? Doesn't matter now.

Joe: The scriptwriter.

Nate: He wrote the bulk of the TV show Bonanza. And Walter is star-struck by this. [laughter] Bonanza! '78, or whenever it was. So they go to this guy's house to threaten Larry Sellers, who ends up being a fifteen-year-old kid. Walter ends up grabbing a tire iron and says, "Do you know what happens, Larry, when you fuck a stranger in the ass? This is what happens!" And he starts smashing what he thinks is Larry Sellers' car. And he just keeps screaming it, "This is what happens when you fuck a stranger in the ass, Larry! This is what happens!" It turns out not to be Larry's car. Very funny scene, probably the best scene in the movie. But, if you watch the movie on an edit on TNT, you can't say "fuck a stranger in the ass." So in the edits, they say "This is what happens when you find a stranger in the alps!" Which is also... Two Nates Up for whoever came up with the dubs for that. They should be paid overtime.

Joe: [laughter]

Nate: And Phoebe Bridgers, her debut album is titled Stranger in the Alps, a reference to the dubbing of that very vulgar scene in the original. I give Phoebe Bridgers One Nate Up. I'm prepared to give her two. I've listened to her debut, I've listened to the boygenius EP, I've listened to the Conor Oberst record. And she writes some of the saddest fucking music I've ever heard. And I think she's great. One Nate, tentatively two.

Joe: ...Fatter Older has earned his credentials.

Nate: How many Joes Down? A Thousand Joes Down?

Joe: What? No! Oh my god, I love Phoebe Bridgers! She is the best third of boygenius.

Nate: I think so too, I agree.

Joe: Um... usually toward the end of these conversations, I talk about sequels. Allegedly, there is a... what do you call that? A...

Nate: Spin-off?

Joe: Spin-off! Coming out.

Nate: Yes.

Joe: You're familiar?

Nate: I am familiar.

Joe: The Jesus Rolls. What do we think that's about?

Nate: I think, if it comes out, it has the potential to go down in history as one of the greatest blunders—

Joe: [laughter]

Nate: —and one of the greatest besmirchings of a legacy in the history of film. The reason the Jesus is funny: number one, John Turturro is a fucking freak in this movie. He is out of his mind funny in this movie. And the little tweaks about him—the fact that he wears a hairnet, the fact that he wears a purple jumpsuit, the fact that his partner, Glen—no, Liam? Liam?

Joe: Sure.

Nate: When he's yelling at the guys, he goes, "You pulled a gun out in the lanes? Liam and me, we're gonna fuck your shit up." I think it's Liam.

Joe: That's the trivia we need.

Nate: Purple jumpsuit, licks the ball, gypsy kings, weird sexual bowling, pedophile... extremely funny. And there's nothing less funny than explaining a joke. To do a Jesus movie would be to explain the joke. He's in the movie for five minutes for a reason. It's because he's a collection of weird characteristics that look funny together, and that Turturro gave life to. Don't do two hours of it. And, like, the fucking Coen Brothers aren't even going to write it or direct it! This is all Turturro . This is a Turturro project.

Joe: This seems like a bad time to release a [movie in which] the protagonist is a child pedophile.

Nate: Yeah, right! The pederast movie! Well, I mean, that's interesting. So by virtue of it being a bad time to release that movie, it might be a good time to release that movie. But, I don't think this is the movie that would... whatever the "pederast movie" is, I don't think this will be it. I preemptively disavow and disown any spin-offs or sequels to The Big Lebowski.

Joe: No "Your Favorite Movie Sequels"!

Nate: No.

Joe: And there's no sequel in this. There's no legit spin-off to this.

Nate: I don't think there is. I think, again... going back to the whole inspiration being these Raymond Chandler novels from the '50s and '60s. Recurring characters—I think Raymond Chandler was the character, and Philip Marlowe was the author. No, Chandler was the writer. Marlowe was the character. And there were a number of different stories with Philip Marlowe getting into scrapes. So in that sense, you could do another Big Lebowski, if the Dude is your detective, wrapped up in this sunshine world of big money and fast women. You could conceivably do it! But, I think that part of what makes this such a good movie is that it doesn't explain any of the jokes. Like I was saying about the Jesus, things are just funny because they are funny, and the less time spent observing them, the better the joke holds up. Which might ultimately be why I think the fucking festival circuit is such a clown show. The reason this shit is funny is because we're not explaining it to each other, we just know that it's funny. The minute you start trying to explain why the jokes are good, you're fucked. I can tell you that part of the appeal of this movie is that... the Dude is at a grocery store writing a check for $.69, and here's George Bush on the TV saying "This aggression against Kuwait will not stand." And then later tells "The Big" Lebowski, "this aggression will not stand." Like, that is funny.

Joe: It ties back to what you said earlier about the Dude being a mirror.

Nate: Right, that is funny stuff, but if you have to explain, "So, he saw that earlier, and that's why he said that," it's not funny. So I think to do it again would be to explain the joke. Let's let the joke be good, and let people figure the joke out for themselves.

Joe: It's a general rule of comedy.

Nate: It is. Listen, as a man who's seen 5000 improv shows, I think I've learned a thing or two.

Joe: [laughter] And have done stand-up!

Nate: [pause] Let's not talk about that now. I think the less said about that... you no longer have my consent to record.

Joe: [laughter]

Nate: That's not true, you still have my consent. It's a great fucking movie, everyone should see it. What did you think of it? Had you seen it before?

Joe: I had seen it before, but in a lax, it's-on-cable type of situation.

Nate: So sitting there really watching it, what did you make of it? Really paying attention to it.

Joe: That it was a fucking shaggy-ass-dog story, that, I guess—consistent with the entertainment that I enjoy—it's more about the journey than the destination? If we're gonna compare The Big Lebowski to Infinite Jest

Nate: [laughter]

Joe: —that's where they compare. In that, like, when you're watching or reading it, this is enjoyable, this is funny, this is intriguing. And when it ends—and The Big Lebowski literally ends with the narrator saying "fuck it, this is over"—I don't think that is detrimental to the story itself.

Nate: I wanna tell you, after watching this movie—I've seen this movie dozens of times—and I've given some thought to it. And I think I know what my favorite joke is.

Joe: Please.

Nate: My favorite joke is in the beginning of the movie, where Sam Elliott is doing this voice-over, about "Sometimes there's a man for his time and place." There's this very dramatic voice-over about introducing a hero, which are undercut with scenes of a guy in a bathrobe, looking at milk, sniffing milk, trying different milks at the grocery store. And he goes to pay for the milk, and he's writing a check to pay for the milk. And all the while, this voice-over is getting more and more grandiose, until it starts to turn on itself, and he goes, "Ah, I lost my train of thought." But my favorite part is when he's introducing this character, looking at the Dude, and he goes, "Sometimes there's a man—and I'm talking about the Dude here." [laughter] And it just fucking kills me, this little one-liner of like, "Yes, of course you're talking about the guy we just watched. Yeah, we know! We get it!" But again, I'm explaining the joke to you, but those little things kill me. Every time I watch it, I find more shit like that, that is like so fucking funny to me. It's the kind of thing you can watch it 25, 30 times because there's just so much to get out of it.

Joe: And that's ultimately the point, it's just a movie with a bunch of small moments.

Nate: This is why you can watch it during the holidays, because there's always something new to find, man! It's like you're unwrapping a present every time you watch it on the holiday.

Joe: I'm trying to picture the A****' house... Okay, so was, like, your grandpa watching the bare-chested woman on the trampoline?

Nate: [laughter] So, I'm trying to remember... I forget how my father came to find this movie, but he was like, "Let's watch The Big Lebowski." And we watched it—my two brothers and I, my mother, and my father—we all watched it. And, ya know, my parents laughed a lot. I think I fell asleep the first time I was watching it. I was in high school, I was probably a fourteen- or fifteen-year-old kid. It's a hard movie, when you're fourteen or fifteen, to follow. Because there's no plot. And you keep being like, "Okay, when's this all going to make sense?" And it never does. And my parents were like "That was good, but, like, weird?" and my dad was like, "Yeah... I think I'm gonna watch it again." And that same weekend, he watched it, and was like, "Oh, I get it, it's way better now." I think it was one of the first VHS cassettes we owned in the house. It was one of the first DVDs we bought when we upgraded to DVD. And it was kind of like... he kept watching it, and by osmosis, we kept watching it with him. To the point where, whenever we got together, which was usually the holidays, it would be like, "Well, it's nine o'clock, we did the Christmas presents, we did the dinner"—

Joe: This is literally Christmas Eve?!

Nate: Christmas Eve!

Joe: [laughter]

Nate: Honestly! The way people would watch It's a Wonderful Life. My parents would have Bailey's, we'd have tea and hot chocolate—

Joe: So you wouldn't put out milk and cookies, you'd put out a white russian...? [laughter]

Nate: [laughter] Yeah, a white russian, and like, a roach clip! And it would be a thing we would watch that was funny, until we got tired and went to sleep for Christmas. But then it kept going. The other movie we would watch a lot on the holidays was Galaxy Quest. Many Christmas Eves watching The Big Lebowski and Galaxy Quest.

Joe: Together?

Nate: Not usually back-to-back. Usually it was one or the other. But my dad went on a big Galaxy Quest kick. Like, "Fine, dad, whatever you want! You bought the Christmas gifts, dad, whatever you wanna put on!"

Joe: Does your Dad emulate the Dude on the other 364 days of the year?

Nate: No. My father is much more "The Big" Lebowski. [pause] It would crush him to hear that.

Joe: [laughter]

Nate: When he eventually reads this write-up... I hope you put this in, because it will destroy him to hear this. But the reality is, he is absolutely more Jeffrey Lebowski than he is the Dude. It's gonna hurt him, because he has the Dude bobblehead, he has the Dude sweater. He's like, when we get mad at each other, "You're being very un-Dude."All that stuff. But he's a high-powered attorney in the construction world! He's not a laizzes-faire shaggy dog.

Joe: He's not a Dudeist?

Nate: [laughter] No. No he is not.